Thursday, March 08, 2007

I, Robot

According to this report from the BBC, the South Korean government plans to establish ethical guidelines for interactions between robots and humans. The article indicates that the guidelines will govern both how robots should behave towards us and how we should behave towards them. It speculates that the guidelines governing behavior of robots may resemble Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics, which is fitting enough, given that the "Robot Ethics Charter" is being drafted by a team that includes a science fiction writer. Asimov's Three Laws are:
  1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Anybody who's seen The Matrix or Terminator movies could think these rules more than prudent. We want robots to serve us rather than enslave or eat us, and consistent with those goals, it would be a shame if robots started committing suicide en masse. The assumption that we need to program robots with something like Asimov's Three Laws suggests that, absent such inhibitions, robots would develop wills of their own (and would of course want to destroy us or at least use our bodies as an energy source). Yet if robots do have minds of their own, might there be something immoral about implanting in their robot brains imperatives that are not the product of their own mental processes? At least some robotophiles so worry.

I'm not so sure myself. For one thing, it's conceivable that a robot could have artificial intelligence without a subjective sense of self. It could be a "ghostless" machine. In that case, there would be no immorality in denying the robot the ability to act on its "will," because the robot wouldn't have a will or any sensations whatsoever. Moreover, even if the robots did have a subjective sense of self, it's not necessarily immoral to program them with certain overriding behavioral laws. Much human behavior is "hard-wired." For example, try as I might, I cannot override the signal my brain sends to my heart to pump blood throughout my body (and a damn good thing too!). Even more sophisticated and largely voluntary behaviors--like craving sweet, salty and fatty foods--are products of our evolutionary history that, in circumstances of plenty, work against our interests and even our (weak) wills. It is not at all clear that a robot hard-wired with Asimov's Three Laws suffers any greater loss of autonomy than we suffer in virtue of our genetic programming.

Finally, there is something pathetic about devoting serious thought to the moral rights of hypotethically sentient robots against being made the Foucauldian vehicles of their own oppression, when human societies afford not even minimal rights against the enslavement, torture and killing of beings we know to have a subjective sense of self and the ability to suffer, namely the other animals with which we share the planet. So, robotistas, I'll make you the following deal: I'll take seriously the possible immorality of Asimov's Three Laws when you become vegans.

12 comments:

egarber said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
egarber said...

Related to my post about the "Quantum Self" in the Scotty thread, there are scientists (maybe pseudo-scientists, I guess) out there who think it's possible to "engineer" a conscience with robotics.

I think the idea is that by pumping enough energy into the system, a form of condensate is generated -- and then "consciousness" (a greater whole) generates out of the parts.

I'll believe that one when I see it, given that I struggle to get my car to even start on some days :)

Derek said...

I'm not sure I understand the "Quantum Self" idea but so far as I know you can't "see" consciousness, and that's really the problem.

One could have a functionally equivalent robot (indistinguishable from a human in the way it reacts to stimuli) and it is still possible (although some people deny this) for it not to be conscious in the way Prof. Dorf is talking about.

This connects up interestingly, I think, with the topic from the personal identity thread in the sense that, should such sophisticated robots come into existence, courts are going to have to decide whether or not they should have rights. And that determination is going to depend on whether or not they are conscious - a decidedly philosophical (rather than legal) question. Similarly, if we invent teleporters, courts will have to decide whether using them is suicide.

egarber said...

On the Quantum self thing, I think I read somewhere that a laser is a form of "condensate" in this way. You pump enough energy into the system, and all particles take on a "higher calling" in the form of the whole. In this example, the laser then takes on a whole (what a laser can do) that transcends the individual parts.

Another example is the way a bazillion termites suddenly "know what to do" (build a mound) when together, while individually in isolation they show no directional behavior.

Some say the brain might give rise to conscience this way -- with all the neuron cells, etc.

But I'm not a scientist, that's for sure.

Carl said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ian Parker said...

Asimovs laws are inadaquate in terms of moral philosophy. They appear to be pacifist. Now pacifism has exercised some of the best minds of Christendom down the generations.

What to you do if you get a group of people who are intent of World domination by force. Like Hitler, Stalin or modern Islamic extremists. They must surely be killed for the benefit of us all.

What I think AI could do. I say AI and not just robotics, is to provide some insight into moral philosophy and investigate Etherial views, that is to say views with no antecedents. Example - infidels must be killed and examine how these iseas form in the human host and how they can be eradicated.

Liberals wax hot over Bush and his war in Iraq. They never conndemn etherialism as such. It is etherialism that is wreking Iraq. The Americans have not been defeated. The Iraqis have.

Combating etherialism will require a multi pronged approach - including AI. I'm afraid though that Asimov does not help us to deal with it.

路傑 said...

免費A片, ut聊天室, AV女優, 美女視訊, 免費成人影片, 成人論壇, 情色交友, 免費AV, 線上a片, 日本美女寫真集, 同志聊天室, 聊天室交友, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 微風成人區, 色美媚部落格, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, 免費A片, 上班族聊天室, A片,H漫, 18成人, a漫, av dvd, 一夜情聊天室, 微風成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人貼圖, 成人電影, 成人, 中部人聊天室, 080中部人聊天室, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 成人電影, A片, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 成人遊戲, 成人影城, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 成人網站, 麗的色遊戲, 色情網站, 成人論壇, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 自拍, 癡漢, , 俱樂部, 豆豆聊天室, 聊天室, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網影音視訊聊天室 免費視訊聊天室 視訊聊天 視訊交友 美女視訊 視訊美女 視訊 免費視訊 免費視訊聊天 視訊聊天室 辣妹視訊 一夜情 色情a片 aio交友愛情館 情色電影 情色視訊 色情遊戲 色情 情色小說 一葉情貼圖片區 色情小說 色情聊天室 情色交友 成人論壇 成人網站 色情網站 情色論壇 小高聊天室 女同志聊天室 6K聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080聊天室 聊天室尋夢園 UT男同志聊天室 男同志聊天室 尋夢園聊天室 UT聊天室 聊天室 豆豆聊天室 A片 成人電影 成人貼圖 嘟嘟成人網 美女交友 本土自拍 成人交友 成人影片http://ssff01.3b8mm.com/

xw said...

The devaluation of the fiesta Gold grows faster than we think of it. I hope it is reflects to the management department about the question of the fiesta money.
It is caused by the continuous influx of fiesta online gold market currencies. On the other hand, buy fiesta Gold is one of these questions. The fiesta online money is one of the causes.

. said...

酒店喝酒,禮服店,酒店小姐,制服店,便服店,鋼琴酒吧,兼差,酒店兼差,酒店打工,伴唱小姐,暑假打工,酒店上班,日式酒店,ktv酒店,酒店,酒店公關,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,酒店上班,酒店打工,禮服酒店,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,經紀 彩色爆米花,經紀人 彩色爆米花,酒店傳播,酒店經紀 彩色爆米花,爆米花,童裝,童裝拍賣,童裝大盤,童裝寄賣,童裝批貨,酒店,酒店,童裝切貨,酒店,GAP童裝,酒店,酒店 ,禮服店 , 酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,招待所,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店上班,暑假打工,酒店公關,酒店兼職,酒店經紀

wsty said...

www.eshooes.com .
www.pumafr.com.
www.myshoess.com.

www.eshooes.com .
www.pumafr.com.
www.myshoess.com.
[url=http://www.pumafr.com]puma shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.eshooes.com]chaussures puma[/url]
[url=http://www.myshoess.com]nike air max ltd[/url]

wsty said...

www.eshooes.com .
www.pumafr.com.
www.myshoess.com.

www.eshooes.com .
www.pumafr.com.
www.myshoess.com.
[url=http://www.pumafr.com]puma shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.eshooes.com]chaussures puma[/url]
[url=http://www.myshoess.com]nike air max ltd[/url]

freefun0616 said...

酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店經紀, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店工作, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀,,