When I read in today’s Wall Street Journal about a settlement of certain “trademark-infringement litigation” between Apple Corps Ltd. (the company founded in 1968 by the Beatles, whose logo is a granny smith apple) and Apple Inc. (we all know who that is and what their logo looks like), I got the feeling that something was missing. Granted, I have not seen the court papers, and since the case was brought in England (presumably under English law) it might not do me all that much good to see them. But as big a Beatles fan as I am, I was taken aback at the notion that anyone could possibly think -- today -- that the Beatles had anything to do with Apple the computer company. What gives?
So I did a little more digging, and came up with what appears to be the answer. According to BBC News reports, Apple Corps asserted or threatened trademark claims against Apple Computer shortly after the computer company was founded in the late 1970s. In 1981, the parties entered into settlement in which Apple Computer basically agreed to stay out of the music field. But later in the 1980s, Apple Computer began to make its machines compatible with Musical Digital Interface devices, which allowed the machines to be used to create and edit music. Apple Corps sued, and that suit resulted in a 1991 agreement pursuant to which Apple Corps reportedly retained exclusive rights to use the name and logo for “any current or future creative works whose principal content is music and/or musical performances, regardless of the means by which those works are recorded or communicated”. The latest lawsuit was commenced in 2003, when Apple Corps claimed that Apple Computer’s iTunes music store -- whose principal content is, after all, music and/or musical performances -- was an impermissible use of the name under the terms of the agreement.
The judge in the case ruled that Apple Computer’s activities did not violate the agreement because the iTunes site is essentially a “market” and has nothing to do with the creation of music. The parties settled to avoid an appeal; the terms are largely undisclosed, but they reportedly do include a transfer of all of the trademark rights to Apple Computer and a license back of some of them to Apple Corps. Which seems to mean that the fight is finally over.
I’m guessing that reasonable minds could differ as to whether the judge was correct in his interpretation of the parties’ 1991 agreement, but to me the moral of the story is something else. I suspect that when Apple (Computer) agreed to the initial restrictions in 1981, it had no idea that it would ever want to enter into the music field. Similarly, when it agreed to the revised restrictions in 1991, it did not anticipate that one day it would actually want to use the name to sell music over the internet. On each of those occasions Apple (Computer) probably thought it was offering Apple (Corps) the contractual equivalent of ice in winter. And when that assumption later turned out to be wrong in each case, the provision ultimately did not deter Apple (Computer) at all from doing precisely what it wanted. All it had to do in each instance was pay the right price.
Now Apple (Computer) has all the rights in these marks. But strangely, it has not yet been able to score the real prize: a license to sell Beatles music on iTunes. Steve Jobs created some buzz when he used the Beatles’ “Lovely Rita” as part of a demonstration of the iPhone at a Macworld conference last month, but I’m thinking that a different Beatles song may have been more fitting.
The news stories suggest that the Apples are nearing an agreement that will allow sales of Beatles music via iTunes, so maybe Jobs can buy love. And "You say you want a revolution" will be podcast.ReplyDelete
I’m thinking that a different Beatles song may have been more fitting.ReplyDelete
And here I was thinking that Jobs should have been singing Britney Spears ("Oops I Did It Again")....
Michael, you may be right, but as I read the news stories it appears to me that everyone is asking if this means that there will soon be a deal to sell Beatles music on iTunes, and Apple Computer is generally responding by saying that it's hopeful that will happen. I'm not sure I've seen any indication by Apple Corps that it is actually leaning in that direction. But I suppose we'll know for sure soon enough . . .ReplyDelete
So to have a good attack, you should level your skill in cabal online alz. Also, get the highest level jewelry that you can equip in thecabal alz. This step depends on your skill rank, for lower magic ranks get 4 fast notice arrow skills and your cabal gold. Of course, if you have more cabal money, you can get more in the game. By the way, you can buy pet from other players in buy cabal alz.ReplyDelete
酒店喝酒,禮服店,酒店小姐,制服店,便服店,鋼琴酒吧,兼差,酒店兼差,酒店打工,伴唱小姐,暑假打工,酒店上班,日式酒店,ktv酒店,酒店,酒店公關,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,酒店上班,酒店打工,禮服酒店,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,經紀 彩色爆米花,經紀人 彩色爆米花,酒店傳播,酒店經紀 彩色爆米花,爆米花,童裝,童裝拍賣,童裝大盤,童裝寄賣,童裝批貨,酒店,酒店,童裝切貨,酒店,GAP童裝,酒店,酒店 ,禮服店 , 酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,招待所,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店上班,暑假打工,酒店公關,酒店兼職,酒店經紀ReplyDelete
[url=http://www.myshoess.com]nike air max ltd[/url]
酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店經紀, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店工作, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀,菲梵,ReplyDelete