Monday, February 11, 2008

Is Bill Clinton the New Michael Richards?

You know you're getting old when there's no longer a question of whether you like the music of the Grammy award winners, but merely whether you've heard of them. Prior to tonight, if someone had asked me who Amy Winehouse was, I'd have either guessed "a low-cal alcoholic drink marketed to college-age women" or "a girl who went to my high school whose name I never knew." I had heard of Kanye West, but only because of what he said about George Bush in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

My own cultural reference points are older. I first started teaching law in the early 1990s, and even then, most of my students looked on in uncomprehending pity at my Monty Python references. Not that this stopped (or stops) me from relying on the old touchstones, but I've tried to update my material a bit. This is made difficult by my almost complete disconnection from current pop culture, so that a "current" reference for me is to a 10-year-old Seinfeld episode.

Which brings me to today's topic. Last week in my con law class I referred to a Seinfeld episode and then got that creepy feeling I now get whenever I think about Michael Richards. It's a little like the feeling I'm sure I'd get if I were to watch a Naked Gun movie and see OJ Simpson. It goes like this: Hey, that's funny. Oh right, he turned out to be a racist (Richards)/murderer (Simpson); maybe not so funny.

And so the question now arises for another 90s celeb, arguably the biggest one of all, William Jefferson Clinton III: Must those of us who formerly viewed him as a reasonably effective President who presided over 8 years of peace and prosperity, albeit one who squandered his enormous political talents because of his personal weaknesses, completely re-evaluate our picture of the 42nd President? Where we once saw a man who was hailed with affection (if also hyperbole) as "the first black President," should we now see instead the man who, when the chips are down, exploited racial divisions? Think of candidate Clinton going out of his way to execute Ricky Ray Rector or to pick a fight with Sister Souljah and prospective First Laddy Clinton dismissing Barack Obama's South Carolina victory on the ground that Jesse Jackson also won South Carolina.

So, is Bill Clinton like Michael Richards? Not entirely. Richards, under pressure from Jerry Seinfeld, apologized. So far, no apology, and no pressure from Hillary.

Posted by Mike Dorf

13 comments:

Mithras said...

As they say, politics ain't beanbag. Also, winning cures many ills, so if Hillary becomes President this unpleasantness will fade in time (especially for white voters, naturally). But if she loses, his antics will be blamed in part, tarnishing his reputation long-term.

And now for something completely different.

-M

egarber said...

So, is Bill Clinton like Michael Richards? Not entirely. Richards, under pressure from Jerry Seinfeld, apologized. So far, no apology, and no pressure from Hillary.

I'd say not even close. Whatever Bill did, he never crossed the Richards line, imo. I get the sense that with Richards, something innate about him came out; with Bill, at most he played a strategy (of course, I'm not defending it), but that doesn't make me believe he's a racist.

Michael C. Dorf said...

In response to egarber, check out the wikipedia entry on michael richards, which says that while in the army, Richards "produced and directed shows dealing with race relations." So maybe Richards was the one acting out of character!

Jean Z. said...

For the record, some of your students are old enough to appreciate the Monty Python and Seinfeld references. So please keep them coming - it makes us feel more "with it," which is at times a nice change.

egarber said...

Good point Mike. Maybe this just means they both made mistakes, and that neither are racists.

Todd_NYC said...

don't drink anymore Kool Aid. "Exploited racial divisions?" Come on, be serious.

Here's Clive Crook:

"Can it seriously be contended that the Clintons thought to advance their campaign (yes, “their” campaign) by alienating black support -- that the crushing defeat in South Carolina is something, as Morris seems to believe, they actually sought? The idea is ridiculous..."

and also Krugman:

"Jesse Jackson — a stupid way to spin a big loss, but hardly part of a coordinated campaign. ...Pretty thin gruel.

Folks, you’ve been played like a fiddle by people in the media who just plain hate the Clintons. They tried to take Hillary down over her clothes, her voice, her tears. When none of that worked, they invented a race war."

The alleged playing-of-the-race-card is now established "fact". But this fact strikes me as little more than "truthiness."

Unknown said...

Here's Clive Crook:

"Can it seriously be contended that the Clintons thought to advance their campaign (yes, “their” campaign) by alienating black support -- that the crushing defeat in South Carolina is something, as Morris seems to believe, they actually sought? The idea is ridiculous..."


I don't know who this Morris is or why someone would attribute this apparently absurd view to him, but even supposing he holds it (which I doubt), ridiculing him in this way does not address the more substantive claim that Clinton started pandering to white and hispanic racists once it became apparent that his wife could not win the black vote. Pointing out that it doesn't make strategic sense to alientate potential voters is rather beside the point in this scenario.

I agree with Krugman, however, that Clinton's comments in SC were probably not part of a calculated effort to attract the racist vote. I think instead they were a reflection of his own deeply racist beliefs that a black man could not win a general election because he could only appeal to other black people and that Clinton supporters, therefore, should take SC with a grain of salt. Whether it will develop into a calculated compaign in the coming weeks and months is an entirely different question altogether.

Anonymous said...

It is the holic gold which makes me very happy these days, my brother says holic money is his favorite games gold he likes, he usually holic online gold to start his game and most of the time he will win the cheap holic gold back and give me some holic online money to play the game.

Anonymous said...

酒店喝酒,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,制服店,便服店,鋼琴酒吧,兼差,酒店兼差,酒店打工,伴唱小姐,暑假打工,酒店上班,日式酒店,舞廳,ktv酒店,酒店,酒店公關,酒店小姐,理容院,日領,龍亨,學生兼差,酒店兼差,酒店上班,酒店打工,禮服酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,經紀 彩色爆米花,經紀人 彩色爆米花,酒店傳播,酒店經紀 彩色爆米花,爆米花,童裝,童裝拍賣,童裝大盤,童裝寄賣,童裝批貨,酒店,酒店,童裝切貨,酒店,GAP童裝,酒店,酒店 ,禮服店 , 酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,招待所,

Anonymous said...

www.eshooes.com .
www.pumafr.com.
www.myshoess.com.
[url=http://www.pumafr.com]puma shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.eshooes.com]chaussures puma[/url]
[url=http://www.myshoess.com]nike air max ltd[/url]

Anonymous said...

,,姐.,便服/,,

Anonymous said...

酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店經紀, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店工作, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀,,

Edwin said...

Buy Kamagra
Earn Google
Viagra Cialis
Cheap Kamagra
Cheap Viagra
Cheap Cialis
Make Money on Google
M65 Jacket
M65 Field Jacket
Airline Dog Carrier
Airline Dog Carriers
Viagra Cialis
Earn Google
Airline Dog Carrier
Airline Dog Carriers
Airline Approved Dog Carriers
ED Hardy Wholesale
Copy DVD Software
How to Send Fax
14k Yellow Gold
Redneck Costume
14k Gold Heart
Tandem Baby Stroller