By Craig Albert
A short note regarding a flap from yesterday. According to the NYT, Senator Kyl was shocked, shocked to learn that AG Holder had not listed in his pre-confirmation questionnaire his "signing" of a brief in the Padilla v Rumsfeld case. Putting aside the fact that Holder (along with Reno and 2 other former DOJ officials who were amici) didn't "sign" those amicus briefs (they were signed by the friendly lawyers at Arnold & Porter), it's hard to imagine that Kyl didn't know about Holder's status in the case, if he had been paying any attention at all. After all, Kyl was an amicus in Hamdan, so he was probably keeping abreast of the issues. The irony is that, as John Dean pointed out in a Findlaw column of a few years ago, Senator Kyl and Senator Graham fabricated a piece of legislative history specifically for the purpose of supporting their amicus position in Hamdan. It's hard to forget the novels that you write.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
徵信 徵信社 私家偵探 偵探社 免費法律諮詢 捉姦 抓姦 尋人 徵信社 徵信 尋人 徵信公司 徵信評鑑 徵信社 外遇 討債公司 離婚 外遇 婚姻諮詢 徵信社 徵信 外遇 徵信 徵信公司 尋人 尋人網 台中徵信社 徵信社 外遇 徵信 徵信社 台北徵信社 台北徵信社 台北徵信社 台北徵信社 台中徵信社 台中徵信社 台中徵信社 台中徵信社 seo seo優化 seo網站排名 網站排名 網路行銷 網站優化 搜尋引擎排名 seo排名 關鍵字排名 關鍵字廣告 護貝機 護貝機 碎紙機 碎紙機 護貝膠膜 護貝機維修
I hadn't thought of that. Thanks.
監視器
監視器材
手機訊號強波器
亂剪 雷門刺青
京王監視器 大哥大訊號強波器 網站SEO
Stella亂剪旗艦店
網站排名首頁
Post a Comment