Tuesday, October 01, 2013

Could Rebranding End the Budget Impasse? For "Republicare"

By Mike Dorf

With the government shutting down and the fear of a default looming as we approach the debt ceiling deadline in two weeks, it's time to start getting nervous for real.  I continue to think that the easiest solution to the impasse would be for Speaker Boehner to abandon the Hastert Rule and bring a clean Continuing Resolution and a clean debt ceiling increase to the House floor for a vote, but lately he has shown no apparent interest in doing so.  Is there a Plan B?

The latest dispatch from the Tea Party front is dispiriting.  The most conservative members of the Republican caucus view the Affordable Care Act in essentially religious terms. They believe the law is evil, quite apart from anything that the law contains.  Pointing out that these very lawmakers or their constituents actually favor much of what the ACA does seems pointless, because they know well that the Devil can quote Scripture.  So are we doomed?

Perhaps, but I have a possible way out of the mess.  Republicans said the same sorts of things about Social Security and Medicare that they're now saying about the ACA.  But once those programs became politically sacrosanct, that fact didn't stop them from portraying themselves (however disingenuously) as the defenders of these programs against particular Democratic proposals to change them.  Why not do the same with the ACA?  Stop calling it Obamacare and start calling it "Republicare".

Such a move would be easier than one might think.  After all, Social Security and Medicare really are government transfer programs.  By contrast, the ACA is a set of relatively modest subsidies and rules designed to build and reinforce the market-based provision of health insurance.  The idea of using tax incentives to increase the pool of healthy people buying private insurance was first made popular by conservative economists who saw it as a free market alternative to what was then being demonized as Hillarycare.  And Mitt Romney was for it before he was against it. So despite the ideological fervor with which Tea Partiers denounce Obamacare, there is really nothing about the ACA that conflicts with their core values.  Asking them to embrace the ACA is not like asking them to embrace abortion rights or gun control.

So how about it GOP?  Instead of committing political suicide and taking down the global economy with you, why not declare victory?  Just take credit for the ACA and we can fight about something we actually disagree about.


Shag from Brookline said...

How about renaming it "HERITAGEHEALTHCARE" abbreviated as 'HHC"?

David Ricardo said...

Excellent post, reminiscent of the Reagan Administration in this way.

When President Reagan was pushing what was known as Reaganomics he supposedly said something to the effect that when it starts to work they will no longer be calling it Reaganomics.

Okay, maybe not a good reference since it is still called Reaganomics.

T Jones said...

It's always been a mistake for the ACA's supporters to acquiesce in the "Obamacare" label." If for no other reason than that the segment of the Republican base who still believe the President is a Muslim illegal immigrant don't need to think about the policy pros and cons of a law named after him - they just know it's bad. That's why the PR "brains" behind the Tea Party slapped that label on it to begin with.
Your suggestion could only work if the House Republicans were a loyal opposition rather than the saboteurs they are. But, if that were the case, there would be no need to come up with a new nickname for the ACA.

funnygames said...

When President Reagan was pushing what was known as Reaganomics he supposedly said something to the effect that when it starts to work they will no longer be calling it Reaganomics.

Cheap Fifa 14 Coins
League of Legends elo boost

Unknown said...