Tuesday, May 01, 2012

Against Diplomatic Asylum--And Against the Supreme Court

By Mike Dorf

When Chen Guangcheng presented himself to U.S. diplomats in China, he sparked a controversy that now threatens to become a crisis in Sino-U.S. relations.  As I write this post, his whereabouts have not been publicly disclosed but he is under American protection in China.  According to the latest news story, Chen is not seeking asylum in the U.S.  However, in the past, individuals have from time to time sought asylum in embassies, consulates and other diplomatic missions.  How should such applications be treated?

The core international law provision at stake is Article 33 of the U.N. Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which forbids "refoulement," i.e., the return of a refugee who is fleeing persecution to his country of origin.  In 1993, in Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court gave a narrow reading to Article 33 (which has been codified in federal statutes implementing the Convention).  In that case, the Court upheld the government policy of intercepting Haitians on the high seas and sending them back to Haiti without first providing individualized determinations of refugee status.  The majority reasoned that the Convention and the implementing legislation operated on the assumption that the non-refoulement duty only came into existence once the putative refugee had entered the sovereign territory of the country in which he or she sought asylum.

But might Haitian Centers Council therefore be invoked as authority in support of a right of non-refoulement at embassies and consulates?  After all, a U.S. embassy or consulate in a foreign land is deemed U.S. territory.  Accordingly, if Chen had sought asylum, would the converse of Haitian Centers Council have entitled him to a status determination and asylum if he could show a fear of persecution on treaty grounds?

To my mind, this gets matters quite backwards.  Although there is something to the linguistic argument the Court made in Haitian Centers Council, as a functional matter it runs away from the core of the Convention, which embodies the principle that if someone manages to exit a country in which he alleges he fears persecution on Convention grounds, then he cannot be returned to that country unless his allegations are false.  The filter that the Convention establishes to prevent countries from being overrun with refugees is a distinction between economic migrants--who often find themselves in truly desperate circumstances but are nonetheless unprotected by the Convention--and refugees fleeing persecution.  Thus, I think Justice Blackmun, in his lone dissent in Haitian Centers Council, had the better of the argument: On its face, Article 33 lacks a territorial limit and there is insufficient reason to read one into it with respect to the high seas.

But embassies and consulates are (or should be) a different story.  The basic obligation of Article 33 is an obligation not to return a putative refugee to her country of origin.  However, a national of Country X seeking asylum in the embassy or consulate of Country Y in Country X is still in her country of origin and thus cannot be returned.  To be sure, international law  indulges the fiction that the embassy or consulate is the sovereign territory of sending Country Y, but this is only a fiction--as becomes clear, for example, if Country X expels the Country Y mission.   Ultimate sovereignty remains with receiving Country X, but it facilitates the smooth conduct of diplomacy for both nations to treat the Y mission as though it were an extraterritorial extension of Y.  (The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations speaks of the "inviolability" of the diplomatic mission, rather than its sovereignty.)

It does not make much sense to treat the Y embassy or consulate in X as Y's territory for all purposes.  And there are at least two reasons why it's a particularly bad idea to regard Y's embassy or consulate in X as subject to the non-refoulement obligation with respect to X's nationals.  First, if Y does grant asylum to a national of X, X is under no obligation to grant that national safe conduct out of the country.  Accordingly, asylum in the embassy could lead to a state of permanent limbo, in which the asylum seeker is entitled to stay in the embassy but not to leave the country.

Second, it is easy to see how the possibility of asylum in an embassy or consulate could lead to serious friction between the receiving country and the sending country.  Of course, the grant of asylum to an X refugee who has managed to leave the country and find her way to country Y could also be a source of friction, but that event occurs far away from X.  One could well imagine that the leaders of X would regard the granting of asylum by Y within the borders of X as a more hostile act.  And that, in turn, could lead to a breakdown in diplomatic relations.  If one thinks that rights-respecting nations have good reasons to maintain diplomatic relations with regimes that engage in rights violations, then it may not be possible to grant embassy or consulate asylum to the nationals of the rights-violating regime--at least not in the ordinary course of events.

Finally, I should be clear that nothing I have said here bears directly on the somewhat different circumstance in which a national of country X seeks asylum from country Y in country Y's embassy or consulate located in country Z.


toryburchshoesgoods said...

Of course, the allow of asylum to an X refugee who has handled to keep the nation and discover her way to nation Y could also be a resource of rubbing, but that occurrence happens far away from X. One could well suppose the commanders of X would respect the allowing of asylum by Y within the boundaries of X as a more violent act. And that, in convert, could cause to a malfunction in diplomatic interaction. If one believes that rights-respecting countries have factors to sustain diplomatic interaction with routines that practice privileges offenses, then it may not be possible to allow embassy or consulate asylum to the people of the rights-violating regime--at least not in the normal course of activities.Cheap office 2010 key
Cheap office 2010 product key
Cheap office 2010 professional key
Cheap office 2010 activation key

love game said...

It does notCheap RS Gold create much feeling to cure the Y embassy or consulate in X as Y's area for all requirements. And there are at least two factors why it's a particularly bad concept to regard Y's embassy orCheap WOW Gold consulate in X as topic to the non-refoulement responsibility with regard to X's people.

de wo said...

Although it is more complicated to implement than the satin will be valid for longer and assists to circumvent defenses railways.
My favors: FIFA 13 ultimate team coins|buy FIFA 13 coins

Upton said...

Electronic Arts has Given That know the list WILL BE PRESENT games at E3 in Los Angeles cheap 2007 runescape gold comes the week, on the left That the expected titles like Plants Vs. tan. Zombies 2, the new line of marine EA Sports games, the spectacular Battlefield 4, que show a rather their first facet will multijugador.Tambin the perfect opportunity to discover the detail titles like FIFA 14, NBA Live, Madden NFL 25 UFC That estrenarn a new graphics engine designed to exploit the technical potential of the new consoles generacin.EA presentarn That has ALSO confirmed the new game from the creators of DmC, Ninja Theory, que Fightback is with estrenarn eleven o'clock in the market per first mobile buy rs gold 2007 games to telephones

brown Kellogg said...

I'm confident that once you read this again you come to read these articles and blogs.

recover deleted text messages from iPhone 5

qq terry said...

Gratefulness touches deeply the tenderness fifa 14 coins of my heart, rendering me ever-profound perception cheap fifa 14 coins as well as ever-soft emotion. It is like the soft melody of “ kiss the rain”, so tender, so emotional fifa 14 coins and so fascinating, leaving me out of all the worldly troubles.

aminos lahragui said...

Very awesome post , i am really impressed with it a lot

فوائد الزنجبيل
فوائد الرمان فوائد الحلبة فوائد البصل فوائد الزعتر فوائد زيت السمسم علاج البواسير فوائد اليانسون فوائد الكركم قصص جحا صور يوم الجمعه علامات الحمل تعريف الحب حياة البرزخ فوائد الزبيب

amine lahragui said...

thanks so much for that great blog and thanks also for accepting my links thanks
طريقة عمل الدونات طريقة عمل البان كيك طريقة عمل الكنافة طريقة عمل البسبوسة طريقة عمل الكيك طريقة عمل عجينة البيتزا فوائد القرفه

aminos lahragui said...

thanks so much i like very so much your post
حلى الاوريو الفطر الهندي صور تورته حلى قهوه طريقة عمل السينابون طريقة عمل بلح الشام بيتزا هت كيكة الزبادي حلا سهل
صور كيك عجينة العشر دقائق