Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Offensive Group Names

By Mike Dorf

I recently received the copy-edited version of my forthcoming book, The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Constitutional Law (with Trevor Morrison).  In the chapter on suspect classifications in equal protection I had used the term "mentally retarded," following the language of the leading case on the subject, Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center.  The copy editor suggested substituting "developmentally disabled," noting in the margin that although "mentally retarded" is still in use, it is regarded as offensive.  Not wanting to give offense, we made the change.  (A friend since noted that in her view "developmentally delayed" is preferable to "developmentally disabled" although "delayed" strikes me as the wrong term for an adult.)  Here I'd like to reflect a bit on how and why the names for disempowered groups change over time.

Let's begin with disability.  Many years ago, persons with physical disabilities were routinely called "cripples."  That term, which is clearly offensive today, gave way to "handicapped," which in turn has mostly given way to "disabled."   (In some circles, terms like "differently abled" are preferred but "disabled" and "disability" appear to remain widely acceptable.)  Meanwhile, persons with developmental disabilities were once called such terms as "imbeciles," "morons," and "idiots," all of which are clearly offensive today and were probably never meant to be purely descriptive.  For one view of the old terminology, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Atkins v. Virginia, in which he notes, among other things, that in the 19th century, "imbeciles" were understood to suffer from "a less severe form of retardation" than "idiots."  Note too that as recently as the Atkins decision, in 2002, all members of the Court were comfortable using the term "mentally retarded."  In Atkins, Justice Scalia also discusses "lunatics," an old catch-all for people who would today be described as suffering from various mental illnesses.  To my knowledge, "mentally ill" and "mental illness" are not now widely regarded as offensive terms, though they may be some day.

What is going on here?  Broadly speaking, social attitudes infect language.  I do not see why, as a matter of literal language, "handicapped" is more offensive than "disabled."  I get that "crippled" is inherently pejorative, insofar as it suggests that a "cripple" is unable to care for herself at all, but arguably "disabled" is worse than "handicapped."  "Handicapped" connotes an obstacle that a person faces but can overcome (as its continued use in golf indicates), and thus seems closer to the term "challenged" that is sometimes preferred.  By contrast, a person who is "disabled" could be literally understood to be unable to perform some set of life tasks.  Likewise, "developmentally disabled" is roughly a linguistic synonym for "mentally retarded."  Here too, focusing on the words alone might lead to the conclusion that the older term is more empowering.  Substituting "developmentally" for "mentally" simply adds a bit of confusion, because one may wonder about the "development" of which faculty or faculties one is discussing.  Meanwhile, "retarded" literally means "slowed," whereas "disabled" could again stand for a total inability.  Thus, taken literally, "mentally retarded" appears to connote greater capacities than "developmentally disabled."

Yet to focus on the literal meaning of the words in the way I have just done is to miss their larger social meaning.  The terms "handicapped" and "mentally retarded" came to be associated with the social attitudes of the larger public at the time these terms were widely used.  Those attitudes were infected by disgust and pity on the part of the non-disabled, while persons with disabilities were made to feel shame.  Contrast President Franklin D. Roosevelt's elaborate efforts to conceal his wheelchair use with the role that former Senator Bob Dole played in promoting passage of the Americans With Disabilities Act and in serving more broadly as a spokesperson and role model for Americans with disabilities.  Or contrast the horrible mistreatment of Rosemary Kennedy with Sarah Palin's proud display of her son Trig.  "Handicapped" and "mentally retarded" became (or are becoming) offensive terms because of how the words made people feel about certain conditions, rather than because of their literal meanings.

To be sure, some shifts in language follow a different logic.  Consider race.  Putting aside the "N word," which was always offensive (when used by whites), over the last 70 years or so, we have seen shifts from "colored" to "Negro" to "Black" to "African American," and then, in some quarters, back to a version of where we started with "persons of color"--although that last term is meant to encompass just about all non-Europeans, rather than Americans of (at least part) African descent specifically.  The first two shifts appear to fit the pattern of rejecting a word because of the attitudes with which it had become associated, but note that the jury is still out on "Black" versus "African American."  That last move was not motivated by any sense that "Black" had become offensive, and it still isn't.  Jesse Jackson, who urged the change, was mostly making a point about the asymmetry of referring to one social group by skin color and referring to other, comparable, groups by ancestral origin (e.g., "Italian American").

Similarly, I do not think that the shift from "Indian" to "Native American" was an example of displacing a word that had become offensive.  As with "Black" to "African American," this shift has not been overwhelmingly embraced by the group itself.  Moreover, the desire to move away from "Indian" may partly reflect changing American demographics: The wave of immigrants to the U.S. from India following legal changes in the 1970s made the term "Indian" especially confusing when used to refer to Native peoples.

Finally, I want to offer a hypothesis: One way we can tell that society has made substantial progress towards eliminating unwarranted stigmas and attitudes towards a group is to notice that the group's name stabilizes. Conversely, where stigma and attitudes reflect a deep-rooted and arguably justified dislike for a group, no amount of name changing will help.  Consider the shift from "psychopath" to "sociopath" to "antisocial personality disorder."  That last term is misleading insofar as it seems to connote shyness rather than lack of empathy.  In any event,  I predict that "antisocial personality disorder" won't stick, given the repugnant behavior characteristic of persons with this condition.

13 comments:

Chriso said...

I personally always liked George Carlin's take on things...regarding it as the sanitation and dilution of language. I find it interesting as a social dynamic that we can, on the one hand, correct terms to be "less offensive" (or more PC) but on the other hand correct other terms to lessen the horrific nature of the circumstances they describe...or manipulate the terms to implicate the victim as either having something wrong with them or being partially responsible (Carlin's great razz on "shell shock" becoming "post-traumatic stress disorder"...as though there is something inherently wrong with the victim instead of focusing on the horrific nature of the event that caused it...is what popped in my head).

As much as I find the study of language and the effect of social movements on its usage fascinating...its effect on how we view people and situations...and how those terms and situations are manipulated by self interested parties, be they politicians, corporations, or NGOs...ends up being a rather depressing commentary on our species as a whole much of the time.

Prup (aka Jim Benton) said...

I have to admit that I have a problem with changing terms myself. I've never been sure, for example, what term to use for 'aboriginal Americans' -- I'd use that myself if the Aussies hadn't fouled it so totally. I dislike "Native Americans" because it is an affront to the meaning of the words -- I am a 'native American' in that i was born here. And I avoid "Indian' because of its perceived inaccuracy. My personal choice is "Amerind" because it makes the distinction I want and is unlikely to be offensive.

But I happen to be a regular on COGITAMUS, and one of the other regulars is an 'aboriginal American' (actually half Apache with the other half Irish) who uses (on the site) the name "Minstrel Hussain Boy." (He's in fact a musician whose played with everyone from Van Morrison to Holly Near.)

I asked him his preference and he said that frequently his people prefer the term "Indian" if they don't use a specific tribal name.

Then there is the famous line -- quasi-quoted -- from Bill Veeck, the Babeball club owner who had an artificial leg after he lost a leg in WWII. "Don't call me handicapped. I am a cripple. That means 'someone who has lost the use of one of his limbs.' Look it up in the dictionary. But I am not 'handicapped' in any activity except tap dancing and running the 100-yard dash.'

Patrick S. O'Donnell said...

Mike,

I found this analysis quite helpful: thanks.

I agree about the somewhat banal connotations associated with the phrase "Anti-Social Personality Disorder" (It sounds like something the nuns in my Catholic school would have used to describe my behavior...and not due to shyness but rather a tendency to be disruptive of the prevailing social order!).

It's certainly arguable as to whether or not the traditional diagnostic criteria that have been used to identify "psychopathy" are now captured by the diagnostic criteria in DSM-IV for "Anti-Social Personality Disorder." As the Wikipedia entry on the former notes, "the PCL-R [Hare Psychopathy Checklist] criteria for identifying a psychopath are stricter than the diagnostic criteria for ASPD...; psychopaths represent a subset of those with ASPD, and psychopaths' traits are more severe." Indeed, I think the criteria for ASPD are sufficiently vague to cast a far wider net. It's with good reason that the criteria are said restricted to someone at least 18 years old, as they might apply to a rather large number of teenagers in our society.

That aside, "Anti-Social Personality Disorder" is a mouthful, and if only for that reason I think you're right that this term "won't stick," at least outside the clinic.

Etienne Jules said...

I've been curious about the use of the term "international student" on American university campuses. Clearly, the term "foreign student" is seen as somehow derogatory.

Another one: "senior citizen" to mean "old person" or, if you prefer, "elderly person". It's the mixing of the notion of citizenship into the notion of age that seems odd, especially when the term is used outside the context of government programs.

bullfighter said...

Even when best intended, deliberate changes in language designed to avoid giving offense are usually doomed to be a quixotic exercise in futility. As long as people have the desire to use a human trait or condition as a basis of an insult, they will do it, and whatever is the current common word for that trait will be instrumental in the fulfillment of the offensive desire. (E.g., note that "gay" is a popular pejorative word among teenagers today, with a very broad range of applicable specific meaning.)

There are some exceptions, of course. Some words that were once common now feel utterly inappropriate even to the vast majority of fair-minded people, even the most PC-resistant ones. The N-word and various offensive words for Jews, Italians or Chinese come to mind. But those have become taboo mainly because their historical use was strongly associated with actual physical abuse, persecution, discrimination or even genocide. Furthermore, I cannot think of any such word that was once the primary "dictionary" term for the given group.

Maggie said...

I hope your copy editor used the term "intellectually disabled," which is the term advocates have advanced to replace "mentally retarded." "Developmentally disabled," on the other hand, is not synonymous with "mentally retarded." Developmental disabilities include mental retardation, but also other disabilities, such as cerebral palsy and autism. The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, formerly the American Association of Mental Retardation has good information here: http://www.aaidd.org/content_104.cfm.
Also, I agree with Bullfighter--as long as people want to insult others as being unintelligent, any term associated with that will be used by some as an insult.

紅豆 said...

徵信社 徵信 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 徵信公司 徵信公司 抓姦 抓姦 碎紙機 碎紙機 seo seo排名 網路行銷 seo seo 網站seo 網站排名 關鍵字排名

Arnold said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Montana

http://pianotutorial.net

goodsasa33 said...


監視器


監視器材


手機訊號強波器


亂剪
 刺青

京王監視器
 大哥大訊號強波器  網站SEO

Stella新亂剪旗艦店


Uni新亂剪旗艦店

Arnold said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Montana

http://pianotutorial.net

每当遇见你 said...

Here’s a list of tools you will need to start: Jewelers’pandora jewellery wire cutters - If you can only afford one pair, get memory wire shears. pandora charms These are designed to make clean cuts on tough memory wire, so can also be used for pandora charms uk softer wires. Chain-nose pliers sometimes called cheap pandora charms needle-nose pliers – Very versatile for picking up and grasping small items, pandora charms sale bending eye pins, closing jumps rings, even closing crimp beads. discount pandora charms Round-nose pliers – Used for creating loops on beaded head and eye pins. Can also be used for winding your own jump rings and as the second pliers you’cheap pandora ll need for closing jump rings. Optional pliers – Wire-looping pliers which have several graduated circumferences to allow you to form perfectly uniform jump rings and loops in place of the pandora discount uk round-nose pliers mentioned above. Crimping pliers which have little notches to allow you to both flatten a crimp bead and then bend it to form a rounded finished look instead of the flat crimp you pandora uk get using the chain-nose pliers. As for materials, I recommend some assortment packs of beads in coordinating colors, some decorative metal spacers, seed beads in both silver and gold These can serve as spacers and beautifully set off pandora sale your other beads., tube-shaped crimp beads Buy the best you can find – these are what hold it all together!, head and eye pins. Other than that, let your choice of project be your guide. You might want some silver or pewter charms.

ducerit said...

Very interesting material. Well when there is so much a new. Many thanks, simply class
college board .

Joshua Smith said...

Don't miss the best offer for house owners. Get cheap home insurance policy for low cost price.