Sunday, June 28, 2009

Lagging Indicators

Employment, we know, is a lagging indicator, so that even if economic recovery begins in earnest later this year, labor force participation (itself a more meaningful number than unemployment) will likely remain low for considerably longer. Support for gay rights by politicians, it turns out, is also a lagging indicator, as noted in this NY Times story on how politicians appear behind the culture with respect to acceptance of homosexuality. (Interestingly, for many years after progressives routinely used the terms gay and lesbian, the Times itself continued to insist on the clinical "homosexuals." Are newspapers also a lagging indicator? But I digress.)

Although this is not the point of the Times article, I would suggest that it holds a broader lesson about the value of courts. A conventional critique of judicial recognition for rights that are the subject of political contestation points to the greater popular legitimacy of elected bodies to resolve such matters. The standard response notes that, where the very issue is protection of minorities and non-conformists, majoritarian processes are inadequate. But if, as I suspect, the Times story is only an exemplar of a larger phenomenon, there is another response available.

The larger phenomenon is this: Politics will, in general, be a lagging indicator of popular opinion about civil rights. Why? Because civil rights struggles, while they are struggles, are invariably divisive, and politicians facing the possibility of tough elections prefer to straddle such issues. (The effective political gerrymandering of the House of Representatives into a great many safe seats for Republicans and Democrats alike cuts in the other direction, but the reps in the swing districts still hold the balance of power, and they are the most likely to want to straddle.) This in turn will mean that legislators will avoid new rights legislation until popular support is very clear, at which point the legislation will be less valuable than it would have been some years earlier, when discrimination would have been more widespread.

Judges are not entirely immune from this phenomenon. They too are not going to protect rights that are on the fringe of public opinion. However, the culture of reasoned argument and, for federal and some state judges, the insulation from politics afforded by lifetime or long-term appointments, enable them to worry less about offending potential supporters. Over the long run, courts do not act in a strongly counter-majoritarian way. But recalling what Keynes said about the long run, if courts recognize rights that the political actors take another decade or so to accept (e.g., Brown v. Board in 1954; Civil Rights Act authorizing Justice Dept to enforce Brown in 1964), that's significant. Thus, in practice, courts, by sometimes being out ahead of politics, may end up being a better indicator of which rights the society is prepared to recognized than elected legislatures.

Posted by Mike Dorf

6 comments:

Kathryn L. Tucker said...

Mike Dorf's Comment is certainly pertient in the current struggle to establish the right of mentally competent, terminally ill individuals to choose aid in dying, when confronted by a dying process the patient finds unbearable.
Legislatures have not been able to enact laws making this choice affirmatively legal; only where voters take direct action via initiative have such measures been enacted(in OR and WA). The Montana Supreme Court is currently considering whether the Montana Constitution protects this choice, as a matter of privacy,dignity and/or equal protection.
Last week a broad, diverse group of organizations and individuals filed amicus briefs urging the Montana Supreme Court to uphold the lower-court ruling that terminally ill Montanans have the right to choose aid in dying. These amici include, among others, medical associations and individual clinicians, civil liberties and human rights organizations, bioethicists, religious leaders, Montana's leading constitutional law experts, and Montana State legislators, arguing that the State Constitution's guarantees of privacy and dignity protect this choice. available in full here:
http://www.compassionandchoices.org/act/legal_work/baxter

The brief of the Appellees is due on 7/15. The State's reply brief is due 8/13.

酒店ㄚ君姐姐 said...

,,,,,,,,,姐.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

狗熊克星 said...

每一位小姐的際遇不同,也有著不同的難處才來到酒店打工或是酒店上班的,這是一個實現夢想的地方酒店兼差不用正常時間的上下班非常彈性酒店經紀人可依您的個人情況安排工作或是暑假打工的機會詢問或寒假打工職缺都可以來電詢問喔

水水想要酒店兼差嗎賺錢不是為了滿足虛榮酒店上班是為了改善生活品質酒店打工進而創造屬於妳自己的人生!酒店經紀人是這偉大夢想的推手實現您的夢想暑假打工的工作時間只是在暑假期間寒假打工的工作是在寒假期間,歡迎來電查詢。

本公司提供酒店兼差的工作查詢只要水水想要來酒店上班或是您想要選擇暫時性的酒店打工也是可以的專業的酒店經紀人依您的需求安排暑假打工屬於暑假期間的職缺寒假打工也是相同的,開學了轉正職的也可以的喔,有興趣歡迎來電洽詢。

cheaprsgold said...

it is really my hornor to have a view at your blog,it is really good.


RS Gold
Diablo 3 Gold

喜洋洋 said...

高雄縣徵信商業同業公會
南部徵信聯盟
外遇觀測站
大愛離婚諮詢網
離婚大剖析
大愛徵信有限公司
尋人專家徵信服務網
女人徵信公司
華陀徵信
離婚協助中心
跟蹤蒐證徵信器材網
抓姦觀測
大愛徵信
溫馨徵信
成功徵信社

喜洋洋 said...

高雄縣徵信商業同業公會
南部徵信聯盟
外遇觀測站
大愛離婚諮詢網
離婚大剖析
大愛徵信有限公司
尋人專家徵信服務網
女人徵信公司
華陀徵信
離婚協助中心
跟蹤蒐證徵信器材網
抓姦觀測
大愛徵信
溫馨徵信
成功徵信社