Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Demjanjuk, Unclean Hands and the "Death Row Phenomenon"

The deportation to Germany of 89-year-old John Demjanjuk may be an occasion to think about the so-called "death-row phenomenon." No, Demjanjuk does not face execution in Germany, which has no death penalty. However, one aspect of his case does raise an issue that has also arisen in the death penalty context.

At the end, Demjanjuk's lawyers argued that he is too old, sick and frail to be deported, an argument rejected by courts in both the U.S. and Germany. But only just barely. One could well imagine that had matters gone only slightly differently, Demjanjuk could have easily slipped into senile dementia or some other condition that would have precluded deportation and/or trial. Or he could have died before the process ran its course.

Yet clearly Demjanjuk himself bears substantial responsibility for his age, illness, and frailty. The Justice Dept initiated proceedings to strip Demjanjuk of his U.S. citizenship over 30 years ago, and it has been sixteen years since the Israeli Supreme Court reversed the finding that Demjanjuk was the notorious "Ivan the Terrible," even as it suggested that Demjanjuk was almost certainly a different Nazi war criminal. If Demjanjuk were now too old and frail to be deported or stand trial, surely that would have been proximately caused by Demjanjuk's own efforts to resist deportation and trial when he was younger and healthier.

Should Demjanjuk therefore have been precluded from even objecting on the basis of age and frailty due to his own unclean hands? That question is not different in kind from the death-row phenomenon. Death-row inmates sometimes argue that a long period on death row is itself an impermissible punishment (under various constitutional provisions or as a matter of international human rights law) because of the anxiety that accompanies living under sentence of death. Yet the death-row phenomenon is itself largely a product of death-row inmates' own willingness to use legal procedures to cause delay. Nonetheless, the Judicial C
ommittee of the Privy Council found that factor ultimately unimportant, as it explained in its 1993 judgment invalidating the Jamaican death penalty:
a State that wishes to retain capital punishment must accept the responsibility of ensuring that execution follows as swiftly as practicable after sentence, allowing a reasonable time for appeal and consideration of reprieve. It is part of the human condition that a condemned man will take every opportunity to save his life through use of the appellate procedure. If the appellate procedure enables the prisoner to prolong the appellate hearings over a period of years, the fault is to be attributed to the appellate system that permits such delay and not to the prisoner who takes advantage of it. Appellate procedures that echo down the years are not compatible with capital punishment. The death row phenomenon must not become established as a part of our jurisprudence.
Note that this logic has not been accepted by U.S. courts, but suppose it were. Some death penalty proponents complain that the procedures available for capital appeals are themselves the result of rules announced by liberal judges hostile to the death penalty---and these death penalty proponents have a point. But they are wrong to suggest that the death row phenomenon is simply a backhanded way of abolishing the death penalty. With more courts and (much) more money for adequate defense in the first instance, a death sentence could possibly be carried out on a schedule that would satisfy the Privy Council (at least now that federal law limits the time taken by habeas review). But that in turn could only be accomplished if capital charges were rare and death sentences rarer still. Interestingly, in the years since the Privy Council ruling, Texas (the leader in capital cases) has imposed many fewer death sentences (although I'm not suggesting any causal relation).

And what about Demjanjuk? His argument was not that the very delay was itself harmful, and for that reason, his hands seem less unclean than those of the death row inmates who complain about the delay that they themselves caused (at least in part). If it really were true that travel to Germany would kill Demjanjuk (and that such travel was not part of his sentence!) or that he had lost his mind and was thus incompetent to stand trial, then it wouldn't matter that he was to blame for the delay. Trying a corpse or a vegetable for war crimes makes no sense, even if that means that the person who became that corpse or vegetable thereby escapes justice.

Posted by Mike Dorf

5 comments:

Bill Abendroth said...

Not to torment an already tormented cliche--but hard cases really do make for bad law. What are the lessons to be learned from the 30+ plus year saga of John Demjanjuk? I prefer Calvin's (from Bill Waterson's "Calvin and Hobbes") conclusion after his bad experience with deranged mutant killer monster snow goons: "Snow goons are bad news." While Calvin based his decision on a distaste for maxims that encourage behavior modification, I am seriously troubled by any efforts to find any broader conclusions from the Demjanjuk case, besides "Being a Nazi concentration camp guard and lying on your application for entry into the US is bad news."

For example, I would argue what Professor Dorf calls the "death-row phenomenon" is completely inapplicable. Mr. Demjanjuk's legacy was an effort to avoid a trial, a determination whether he was in fact a Nazi war criminal. For men on death row, the issue is not avoiding a factual determination; the issue is that the factual determination was hopelessly flawed. While there can no question that spending decades on "death row" is unpleasant (if not "cruel and unusual"), the fault does not lie with the inmate, putting forward his appeals and habeas petitions.

I would argue the fault lies with the State, insisting in the name of "closure"--as well as giving the complaining witnesses peace of mind--that SOMEONE (even the wrong guy) should be put to death. The Innocence Project has been able to prove many "convicted" defendants facing the death penalty are in fact innocent. In 2000, Illinois Governor George Ryan concluding "We have freed more people than we have put to death," and issued a moratorium on the death penalty.

Far from providing the necessary funding for DNA testing to be sure the "right guy" has been convicted, states have tried to both limit appeals and sought to destroy evidence, simply to prevent DNA testing.

If a state wants to have a death penalty, then it behooves the state to have a thorough and competent process. Unfortunately, such a process does not exist. For example, in the run up to then Texas Governor George W. Bush's 2000 presidential election, Texas executed an inmate a week. Governor Bush insisted he gave every case a complete and careful review--but then his time logs showed he spent a total of 15 minutes on each case. Additionally, there was at least one example where his aide Alberto Gonzales badly distorted the trial findings, seriously weakening the defendant's claims of not being culpable.

When a court system, facing a serious crime and the accompanying societal pressures to "find the bad guy," can't even be counted on to get the right guy with any degree of confidence, followed by the temerity of preventing convicted felons from proving their innocence in the name of "finality"--blaming inmates for contesting a broken and incompetent system of justice is badly misplaced.

Which is also bad news, no matter how you look at it.

best-tutor said...

Hello!

very nice post... enjoyed it very much.

Thank you

http://www.best-tutor.com
http://best-tutor.com"

good site

tutor
tutor

酒店經紀ㄚ君姐姐 said...

,,領檯姐.,便服店,,

狗熊克星 said...

青青草園報導 大陸新娘介紹愛心助人,嘉義一名大陸新娘仲介為了救治同為外籍新娘介紹的好友莎莎,莎莎是一位外籍新娘仲介由於雙手工作受傷無法拿東西工作,越南新娘介紹每天早上都會送早餐去給莎莎吃他們常透過越南新娘仲介論壇此位越南新娘介紹還會幫生病小姑按摩,她有一個越南新娘仲介的好朋友阿花也從越南嫁來的她非常的有愛心,大陸新娘仲介體貼細心體貼的照顧小姑旁邊的居民都覺的非常的有愛心,由於外籍新娘介紹的先生是做水電工的,薪水很不多,她從無怨言,且大陸新娘介紹對小孩都照顧的很好,讓老公無後顧之憂在外打拼,外籍新娘仲介的孝行令他的越南新娘介紹朋友要她堅持只要女兒監護權,不要拿生活費,靠著越南新娘仲介的友人資助,從路邊攤起家賣

家鄉美食,5年前租下店面,每天他的外籍新娘介紹的朋友會來幫忙,傍晚四點剛過,店內已擠滿大陸新娘仲介,位於木柵光明戲院口的阿美小吃店,不論魚飯、河粉好吃,在客人的有口皆碑相傳下,不僅外籍新娘仲介同鄉,連大陸新娘介紹也聞香來光顧其她每天會到同事越南新娘介紹的朋友公司拿手工藝的材料回家加工,他有一個越南新娘仲介的朋友非常有愛心,得知他先生受傷無法工作,大陸新娘仲介主動把他的多年的存款捐一半給外籍新娘介紹,幫助他們度過難關,外籍新娘仲介大愛令人非常感動,祝大陸新娘介紹的老公的腳傷早日康復當地許多人都娶越南新娘介紹,因為到了假日許多觀光客,老公要做生意,這些越南新娘仲介或是外籍新娘介紹都會很乖的在家照顧公婆,把家裡打理

的很好,所以大家口耳相傳,許多人都娶外籍新娘仲介,她們也把家鄉的美食好手藝教他們的小姑,讓大陸新娘仲介們除了賣甘草茶之外,很多種好吃的東西可以賣給大陸新娘介紹越南新娘介紹會寫程式的人非常少,板橋也有一位越南新娘仲介會寫c語言,真的很特別,現在大陸新娘仲介們有接到案子做不來時都會問問其它外籍新娘介紹大陸新娘介紹有沒有時間接案子,這些外籍新娘仲介在家照顧小孩位越南新娘介紹他老公有肝病,常常要帶他去看醫生,他力氣較小,越南新娘仲介每次看到他帶他出來她都會主動上前去幫忙,這看在另一位外籍新娘介紹的眼裡非常的感動,於是這位外籍新娘仲介也主動加入義工的行列,在這個社區內,大陸新娘仲介都像是一家人一樣相互扶持相互幫忙

讓這些台灣媳婦的大陸新娘介紹的愛心,他的大陸新娘介紹朋友要她堅持只要女兒監護權,不拿半毛錢,靠著外籍新娘仲介的友人資助,從路邊攤起家賣家鄉小吃,6年前租下店面,每天他的越南新娘仲介的朋友會來幫忙,中午12點都還沒到,店內已擠滿大陸新娘仲介,位於新莊中港路的阿信小吃店,不論水煎包、蛋包飯好好吃,在客戶口耳相傳下,不僅越南新娘介紹同鄉,連外籍新娘介紹以及!大陸新娘仲介等一律納入就保加保對象,一旦失業,越南新娘介紹同樣凡是越南新娘仲介下面的,大陸新娘介紹約二萬五千五百四十八人。可向投保單位反應,大陸新娘仲介會追溯自五月起納保近陳潔聽朋友說,外籍新娘介紹失業也可領失業給付,她既失望又難過。外籍新娘仲介解釋

gaohui said...

On the other hand,Harley boots ed hardy clothes often is the usual lift-up model with a face Christian audigier shield.One luxury full-faced Harley helmet to look for ed hardy shoes can be the GP Tech Metal Warrior. This Kevlar ed hardy outlet made helmet comes standard considering the ultimate Integrated Ventilation to ed hardy Bikini provide you with oxygen in your ride. And, techniques about fogging ed hardy hats in the shield together with the outdoors, the ed hardy swimsuits helmet will be fog proof. The optimim finish on the helmet guarantees ed hardy clothing no scratches, either. However, ed hardy glasses this amazing ed hardy Jackets tool industry around and may just break your bank! If ed hardyprice is an object, devote all across $70.00 and share with the ed hardy iphone cases conventional stock half helmet. That should as ed hardy dresses a minimum produce a number protection an individual's Harley davidson lower.