-- Posted by Neil H. Buchanan
In my new Verdict column, I summarize many of the arguments in the "Hobby Lobby Post Mortem" series of 9 posts that Professor Dorf and I have written since June 30, adding some thoughts on why even reluctant businesses might feel pressured, post-Hobby Lobby, to "find religion."
Normally, a new Verdict column is accompanied by a Dorf on Law post, exploring in more detail one or more questions raised in the column. Today is an exception to that rule, because I have nothing further to add here on Dorf on Law. Interested readers can find the column here. My Dorf on Law post for the day, addressing the politics of budgets and debt ceilings, is available immediately below (if you are viewing the main page of the blog) or here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Since Neil will not follow up on Hobby Lobby, those interested might check out Timothy Egan's NYTimes column "Faith-Based Fanatics" that focuses primarily internationally but closes with this:
"In the United States, God is on the currency. By brilliant design, though, he is not mentioned in the Constitution. The founders were explicit: This country would never formally align God with one political party, or allow someone to use religion to ignore civil laws. At least that was the intent. In this summer of the violent God, five justices on the Supreme Court seem to feel otherwise."
應收帳款問題
呆帳問題
企業異動監控
沖開
Not sure how I can compete with the other comments, but :)
I’m intrigued by the possibility that RFRA itself might violate the establishment clause. A few thoughts:
1. Assuming that a neutral regulation meets a rational government need, does RFRA not elevate believers above non-believers, or other believers? Suppose a regulation offends my competitor, yet he can exclude himself from it via a religious exemption, while I bear the cost of the rule. Is that not a form of establishment, whereby law grants one special privilege specifically because of the individual’s religious affiliation?
2.It seems to me that RFRA unavoidably entangles government with religion, no matter the potential safeguards. How can a judge inquire into “sincerity” of belief without inquiring about the belief itself? Even if done carefully, that dynamic makes the government an arbiter of legitimacy in an intimately personal space. Drawing any lines places religion within the government’s “cognizance” (Madison).
Very awesome post , i am really impressed with it a lot
إعلانات مبوبة
مستعمل
Very awesome post , i am really impressed with it a lot
فوائد الزنجبيل
فوائد الرمان
فوائد الحلبة
فوائد البصل
فوائد الزعتر
فوائد زيت السمسم
علاج البواسير
فوائد اليانسون
فوائد الكركم
قصص جحا
صور يوم الجمعه
علامات الحمل
تعريف الحب حياة البرزخفوائد الزبيب
nice post thanks
ماجستير
ماجستير تربية
ماجستير ادارة اعمال
مدونة ليبياتنا
مدونة ليبياتنا ثقافية ترفيهية
I would like to thank you for the efforts you had made for writing this awesome article
منتديات فوركس
I am really glad to be here.I hope to see more great articles here in the future too so keep it up and good luck to all of you!
autoacross.com |
Very awesome post , i am really impressed with it a lot
طريقة عمل الدونات طريقة عمل الغريبة طريقة عمل البان كيك طريقة عمل البسبوسة
طريقة عمل الكنافة طريقة عمل الكيك
طريقة عمل عجينة البيتزا فوائد القرفه العاب برامج
thanks so much i like very so much your post
حلى الاوريو الفطر الهندي صور تورته حلى قهوه طريقة عمل السينابون طريقة عمل بلح الشام بيتزا هت كيكة الزبادي حلا سهل صور كيك عجينة العشر دقائق
Wow what a Great Information about World Day its very nice informative post. thanks for the post.
cmdenttravel.com |
Try to visit my blog -> free download lagu mp3 index lagu
Very awesome post , i am really impressed with it a lot
Arts de la table
recette tiramisu
gateau aux pommes
creme patissiere
creme anglaise
recette chantilly
recette gaufre
recette galette des rois
mélatonine
CS:GO BET
The Terraces Kanatal
Resorts near Delhi
Tree house Jaipur
Weekend Getaway from Delhi
Rafting in Rishikesh
Day outing near Delhi
Post a Comment