Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Wrong But Not (Entirely) Hypocritical

By Mike Dorf

According to many Democrats, the Republicans have been engaged in an extraordinarily cynical grand political strategy over the last three and a half years: First they used every lever available to prevent President Obama and the Democrats from enacting their full economic agenda; then, when the reduced economic agenda that did manage to get enacted came up short, Republicans claimed (and continue to claim) that the Democrats had their chance and failed.  Paul Krugman laid out a nice summary of the argument in his column yesterday.

There's much that's right about this story.  That's what prompted Jon Stewart to say something bleep-worthy when he played the clip of Mitt Romney's acceptance speech in which Romney made the following incredible claim: "I wish President Obama had succeeded because I want America to succeed."  This from a man who has been running for president more or less full time for the last six years.

But there's also a fair bit that's not quite right about Krugman's story.  Although Republicans did obstruct, so-called "blue-dog" Democrats were instrumental in preventing the President from getting the bigger stimulus that economists like Krugman wanted.  Moreover, by putting his economic policy in the hands of Tim Geithner and (for a time) Larry Summers, Obama signaled from the beginning that he was not interested in bold progressive action.

Of course, these are criticisms of Obama from the left, not the right.  Seen within the truncated bounds of what can be accomplished on the American political spectrum, the obstructionist charge has teeth.  Certainly one can find examples of politicians (including Romney and Mitch McConnell) saying that they hoped Obama's policies would fail so that he would only serve one term.  But it's still not clear to me that the Republican obstructionism of the last 3.5 years is mostly hypocrisy rather than ideological commitment.

To make sense of the Krugman narrative, one must begin with the premise that Republicans know that Keynesianism is right, so that increased government spending during a recession would lead to economic growth.  However, according to the Krugman narrative, in order to sabotage the economy, the Republicans voted against stimulus measures, hoping that as a consequence the Obama Administration and Congressional Democrats would get the blame.

Is this a plausible account of Republicans' behavior over the last several years?  I think the answer is yes for some but no for most.  Most Republicans are ideological Hayekians, who believe that stimulus spending gives the economy a short-term boost that is not self-sustaining, causing more damage in the long run.  When such people voted against the stimulus in 2009, they thought the were blocking a harmful program.  Thus, when they look at the anemic pace of the recovery, they think that if only we had let the economy find its natural bottom, we would be doing better now.  For them, the stimulus was too large, not too small.

Krugman thinks the Hayekian view of the economy is so clearly wrong that Republicans can't really believe it.  And not only can he point to 2009 statements by Republicans saying that they wanted Obama to fail; he can (and did) also point out how Republicans do appear to believe in the power of government military spending and stimulus through tax cuts.  So the Republicans are just claiming to be Hayekians as the thinnest cover for their real goal of harming the economy and thus leaving Obama and the Congressional Democrats to blame.

But people believe all sorts of crazy things that contradict other things they also believe.  Indeed, even people that Krugman does not regard as otherwise-crazy sincerely believe the Hayekian line.  They're called Europeans.  Sure, it has been a disaster for them, but the fact that so many of them have stuck with austerity for so long--even when, as in the case of the UK, they have their own currency and so could have tried massive stimulus--just goes to show the power of an idée fixe.

Accordingly, I do not think it has been shown that the GOP as a whole engaged in a cynical game of deliberately tanking the economy to gain political advantage.  Most of the party's elected officials probably  really believed--and continue to believe--that by opposing Democratic Keynesianism they were helping the economy.  Lucky for them (in a political sense), they were wrong.

15 comments:

Sam Rickless said...

But here's the thing. Republicans almost without exception believe in heavy duty defense spending. Many of them believe in agricultural subsidies and subsidies for companies struggling in the face of global competition. None of this is Hayekian. It's true, as you say, that it is possible for people to believe contradictory things. But when the contradiction is blatant, rational principles of interpretation suggest that factors other than the sincere acceptance of contradictory propositions are likely at work. This is a particularly tempting hypothesis when what Republicans say does not fit what they do. For example, Republicans accuse Democrats of not being serious about slowing, stopping, and reversing the growth of the national debt. Then they turn right around and advocate policies that they are well aware will add to the national debt. This is dissimulation, not sincerity.

Shak Olreal said...

This is a particularly tempting hypothesis when what Republicans say does not fit what they do. For example, Republicans accuse Democrats of not being serious about slowing,Windows 7 professional product Key
Buy Windows 7 prduct Key
Windows 7 ultimate Activation Key
stopping, and reversing the growth of the national debt. Then they turn right around and advocate policies that they are well aware will add to the national debt. This is dissimulation, not sincerity.

Miller Yu said...

This is a particularly diablo 3 Goldtempting speculation any time exactly what Republicans declare doesn't healthy their work. One example is, Republicans accuse Democrats involving not being serious about decreasing, ceasing, and also preventing the rise of the countrywide creditRunescape Gold card debt. They change around and advocate guidelines actually aware will prove to add for the country wide personal debt. That is dissimulation, definitely not candor.

SevenIna said...

We supply all WOW Gold services. wow gold We provide all WOW Gold & WOW Power Leveling services. You can buy wow gold, home to the cheapest cheap gold for wow cheap wow gold and Buy World of Warcraft Gold here. Enjoy a better game experience; you should better have large number of wow US gold! buy wow gold Cheapest wow gold are provided by lorland.

morgan rogoff said...

Your site is one of the beautiful place and I am delighted to find some more information about its natural beauty. Now I am much excited to visit it. Thank get fast essay , uk academic paper company , case study essay , pay for assignment , pay for coursework , personal statement online






Mike Edward said...

I just found this blog and have high hopes for it to continue. Keep up the great work, its hard to find good ones. I have added to my favorites. And the concept of Thank You. Assignment help | Lab report | Term paper | Dissertation Proposal | Case Study

Paul Boul said...

I think this is one of the most important information for me. And i am glad reading your article. Good job, cheers paper assistance , Probability and statistics , Finance homework for student , C programming help , Purchase assignment , Admission essay service , cheap uk essays , essay for sales , help me in my essay , help me in assignment , Coding assignment , Coursework online


Jorden Dev said...

Good article! Thank you so much for sharing this post. Your views truly open my mind.
logo design online || seo web design service || banner designs || seo articles

joseph said...

This is an excellent web post, it is great and wonderful content, I like the way of your writing.
UK coursework writing help=║=need to buy coursework=║=how to get coursework writing service=║=seasoned coursework writer=║=paying someone to do your coursework=║=write my coursework for free=║=reasonable price coursework=║=gcse coursework writing uk=║=a level coursework online

wei liu said...

Thank you greatly with regard to revealing this valuable data. cheap phones for saleI might definitely similar to.

qiong zhang said...

Wow, you are amazing! I cheap android phones love everything about this.

alberta11 said...

Since I have studied this poems, I knowed that wirting a great poems is difficult. Also I think the best android phones techology is so important~

Amanda kennedy said...

This blog is really fantastic and informative for me
project management training

Tome mark said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tome mark said...

A assortment of natives think that donation letters require a lot of crack, in view of the fact that it come with skills in script, consulting, research, development the course, storytelling, debunking internet marketing, budgeting and interviews.Please click this site,,bestessays.com review . All these are essential since the grant writer serve the vital connection between the grant finder and the funder.