Monday, October 24, 2011

The Cultural Meaning of Defense Policy

By Mike Dorf


My latest Verdict column asks whether there is an emerging "Obama Doctrine" regarding the use of military force.  I say there is, and that it emphasizes air power, drone strikes, and special operations, rather than boots on the ground.  That much strikes me as largely uncontroversial, simply an extrapolation from recent events.  I also discuss some of the costs and benefits of the Obama Doctrine, as well as legal questions it raises.

Here I want to focus a little bit of attention on an issue the column raises in passing: The tendency of right-wing commentators to portray Obama differently, as dangerously multilateralist and uninterested in using force to defend U.S. national interests.  I give as an example an article by Douglas Feith and Seth Cropsey.  Readers will recall that Feith, the architect of much that went wrong in American war policy under President Bush, was described by General Tommy Franks as "the dumbest fucking guy on the planet," a characterization that strikes me as unfair.  Feith is arguably a war criminal, but he is not stupid.  In any event, I use the Feith/Cropsey article as only one example of a general phenomenon.  As noted last week on the Daily Show, a wide array of conservative pundits have sought to portray the Obama Administration's success in Libya as failure, often using the same trope as Feith and Cropsey: Obama is basically weak on defense, and so any examples of strength must be minimized.

To some extent, this is simply partisanship.  Republicans who more or less accused Democrats of treason when the latter questioned military operations initiated by Republican Presidents have questioned the legality of Democratic-initiated military operations, like Clinton's use of force in Kosovo and Obama's in Libya.  And the second half of that equation, in my view, is probably a good thing: The general tendency of Congress is to go along with whatever use of force the President attempts, so even hypocritical resistance to a President's desire to use force in international relations can serve as an important check on the White House.

Moreover, some Republicans are genuinely opposed to most American overseas military adventures.  As Sam Tanenhaus noted in yesterday's NY Times, there once was a robust isolationist wing of the Republican Party.  Pat Buchanan tried to speak for it during his ill-fated fifteen minutes of fame in the early 1990s and lately Ron Paul has been the standard bearer for a revival of right-wing isolationism.  Meanwhile, the likes of Arianna Huffington have been arguing since around 2006 that the doves-on-the-left/hawks-on-the-right assumption is increasingly outdated.  And indeed, as the nation tired first of the Iraq war and has now tired of the Afghanistan war, it does look like there's no political angle in militarism.

But to my mind--and as Tanenhaus essentially says--rumors of the demise of Republicans trying to portray Democrats as weak on defense are greatly exaggerated.  Roughly since the 1972 Presidential election, when anti-war activists came to be associated with the Democratic Party (rather than opposing the policy of both parties), Republicans have been claiming to be strong on defense partly as a cultural marker: They want to distance themselves, the "real Americans," from the sorts of people thought to oppose military adventures overseas.  Thousands of "Support Our Troops--Bring Them Home" bumper stickers have not dislodged the idea for conservative voters that those who oppose war or even particular wars are in some sense anti-American.

Perhaps some day that connection will be broken, but not this election cycle.  Running against Obama, who is already "other-ized" by much of the Republican base, Republicans will continue to allege that he is weak, evidence be damned.  Characterizing Obama as weak serves as a kind of deep code for the claim that Obama is not truly American.  This will not likely be a dominant theme in the 2012 election, which will almost certainly turn on the economy, but if a recovery is seen as picking up steam a year from now, look for  a flurry of otherwise perplexing ads and statements describing Obama as reluctant to use force to defend American interests and values.

9 comments:

AF said...

I am sure these ads will run, but doubt they have a significant impact.

I agree that when the circumstances are aligned, defense remains salient as a "cultural marker"; see the 2004 election. But the circumstances this year point against it. From the perspective of the average swing voter, Obama's foreign policy achievements are among the few bright spots in his presidency. He killed Osama. He helped kill Qaddafi. He brought the troops home from Iraq like he said he would. In contrast, Obama's domestic record is extremely unpopular: he is held responsible for bailing out the banks, for passing a stimulus that is perceived as failing but inflating the deficit, for passing a controversial health care reform, and for ultimately failing to improve the economy. Particularly in the last year, the fiasco of the deficit talks has made Obama look weak as well as ineffective.

If Republicans focus too much on Obama's foreign policy record, they risk focusing voters' attention on the fact that he killed Osama and Qaddafi and ended the war, which make him look strong and effective. Republicans are far better off following the Clinton dictum: It's the economy, stupid.

trust said...

i am very interested how this issue will be handle by the press

KellyCrown said...

Very insightful. However there is something I just don't understand and I believe most do without knowing. Have you noticed a lot of the population can't seem to say President Obama, they just say Obama. The one time in this article he mentioned former Pres. Bush, he used prefix Pres. but was unable for the multiple times he mentioned Pres. Obama. What gives.

love wow said...

Almost all of the Mmo foreign exchange shops will Cheap RS2 Gold

gestate the smallest percentage from your RS your old watches, if your hold might be vast, after this you will have to wait for a

inadequate piece (usually around for hours and even numerous hours) until mass cod your inventory for you World Of Warcraft Gold personally. You should be affected individual now and then if they're

made available-come out of the closet at that moment,Gold WOW it's very touchstone

internet marketing sold-come out meant for you actually, due to the fact Precious metal is successful using most of oceans.

Cristiero Rola said...

wow goldI acknowledge that when the conditions are arranged, safety is still significant as a "cultural marker"; see the 2004 political election. But the conditions this season point against it. From the point of view of the normal move voter, Our country's overseas plan successes are among the few shiny areas in his government 英文seoadministration. He wiped out Osama. He aided eliminate Qaddafi. He introduced the soldiers home from Irak like he said he would. In comparison, Our country's home record is extremely unpopular: he is attributed for bailing out the lenders, for driving a government that is recognized as screwing up but growing the debts, for driving a questionable medical change, and for finally screwing up to improve the economic system. Particularly in the last season, the problems of the debts shares has made Obama look vulnerable as well as useless. seo博客

Show you said...

And indeed, since the country tired earliest with the Iraq war and has now tired with the Afghanistan war, it does search seolike there's no political angle in militarism.

Paley Rene said...

Very insightful. However there is something I just don't understand and I believe most do without knowing. Have you noticed a lot of the population can't seem to say President Obama, they just say Obama. The one time in this article he mentioned former Pres. Bush, he used prefix Pres. but was unable for the multiple times he mentioned Pres. Obama. What gives. Buy Cheap Windows 7 Key
Windows 7 ultimate Key
Windows 7 professional Key
Windows 7 Key

zi xing said...

Pet dog fashion wouldn't be complete without the dog clothes. Today, you can choose from a wide variety of dog clothing types. For fashion-forward dog owners, grab a couple of fancy collars adorned with glitters, sequins, or rhinestones. If you're a no-fuss dog owner, you can opt for a simple yet sturdy dog clothes that comes with an ID tag. Before you grab a collar for your pet, make sure that it'll fit your dog just right. To get the right size, measure your dog's neck and add just an inch. Including an allowance into the actual measurement is one good way of getting dog clothing that's not too tight or too loose.
By Author:http://www.lovelonglong.com

naomiwu said...

http://www.tonypl.com provides with fantastic Diablo 3 gold,Wow leveling,Tera gold , Diablo 3 items , Wow gold but really reasonable cost and good quality services.