Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Speech at Funerals: Snyder v. Phelps Through the Looking Glass

By Mike Dorf


Yesterday's NY Times carried a story about a lawsuit in federal district court alleging that the federal government is violating the First Amendment by censoring the religious speech of VFW honor guards at a military cemetery in Houston, TX.  The complaint lists causes of action under freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, the Establishment Clause, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (which was held invalid by the Supreme Court as applied to states and localities in 1997 but remains valid against the federal government).

Juxtaposing the Times story with the complaint and supporting affidavits, it appears that there is an important disputed question of fact: Does the Department of Veterans Affairs require private speakers to obtain prior family approval to recite religious messages while permitting non-religious messages without prior family approval (as the complaint alleges), or does the policy require family approval for any spoken text?  Resolution of that question could be important for determining whether the government is engaging in viewpoint discrimination. I don't know nearly enough about the facts in the case, so I'll just note the factual question and move on.

Even if the government is not discriminating against the religious content of the ceremonies that the Veterans wish to perform, the policy could be unconstitutional simply in virtue of the fact that it presumptively silences speakers on public property.  Nonetheless, I think the right doctrinal answer is that, absent discrimination, the policy is valid.

Why?  Because a military cemetery is government property but not a so-called "public forum."  Indeed, it is not really a forum for speech at all--except in the very limited sense that the families of deceased veterans are entitled to hold ceremonies and visit graves in the cemeteries.  In such a setting, government regulation of speech need only be "reasonable," and it is hard to argue that it places an unreasonable burden on speech to require that those who would speak at a funeral receive permission from the family members who are conducting the funeral.

That result will at first seem odd if stacked up next to the ruling earlier this year in Snyder v. Phelps.  Can the First Amendment really mean that bigoted protesters have a right to picket military funerals but that a VFW honor guard should be presumptively excluded?  No, of course not, because that's not a fair characterization of the two cases.  The Court in Snyder emphasized that the respondents were not at the funeral.  Indeed, they were not even visible from the funeral.  So there is no real inconsistency.

Still, if the right answer in the Houston case is that the government may require speakers to get permission from the deceased's family before speaking at a funeral, that must be because a funeral is an extraordinary event.  Under most other circumstances, it makes sense to construe the First Amendment to require that the default rule is to permit speech, until the prospective audience opts out.  The plaintiffs in the Houston case argue that the government policy at the cemetery amounts to a "prior restraint" on their speech.  In most other contexts, that might be right.  But in certain settings the presumption can be reversed.  The home is one such setting (as illustrated by Frisby v. Schultz).  Cemeteries during funerals ought to be another.  Certainly nothing in the Snyder case rules out that conclusion.

21 comments:

Bob Hurt said...

In the Snyder case the protesters disrupted the ceremony, and their message alienated the attendees to the ceremony. In the Houston scene, the honor guard conducted a traditional ceremony against which no one protested, not even the cemetery director. The policy seems idiotic, AND illegal. The honor guard ought to continue its tradition unless the grieving family requests otherwise, and the cemetery director ought to stay out of it.

Let's face it: funerals are idiotic. The dead don't care, and their bodies/ashes have no life in them. people might as well bury a stool, log, or slip of paper. In fact, people shouldn't bury anything at all. Bodies should be converted to Soylent Green or fertilizer after harvesting organs.

You find the best kind funeral in the streets of New Orleans - a jazz band procession celebrating the life, not mourning the loss. Everybody has plenty of advance notice of a serviceman's death. Plenty. No surprises. So why the mourning?

Anyway both the Houston case and the Snyder case point to nonsense in the judiciary, nonsense called public policy. What part of "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" don't the courts and government executives understand? Like it or not, Courts make laws all the time. Every time they make a ruling like Snyder, or edict as in Houston, they interfere with free speech AND free exercise of religion, AND they establish a new religion of PUBLIC POLICY.

Public Policy is a polite term for Tyranny.

Joe said...

I agree with the basic sentiments expressed by this post.

But, the bottom line is that a policy set forth during the Bush Administration to respect the wishes of the vet's families should not be that controversial. The concern is that the family's wishes (and if known, the vet, I assume) is paramount. This is as it should be.

A funeral is a type of sacrament for many religious traditions. It is fitting and proper that it is carefully set forth that the family's religious beliefs are respected. If the groups here want to express another viewpoint, don't do it on the military ceremony.

The viewpoint issue is serious but I think a case could be made that there is something specifically important about religious content here. But, from the article alone there doesn't even seem to be such a line. The controversy might have rose over that issue, but it isn't the only thing permission is required for.

Michael C. Dorf said...

Joe: The plaintiffs' complaint and supporting affidavits contend that the policy has been applied in a discriminatory manner. As I said in the post, I don't know whether that's true. You raise an interesting possibility: Even if the cemetery authorities are discriminating against religious speech, that still might be acceptable. I don't think that's a permissible result under existing Religion Clause case law but a policy argument could be made for it on the grounds you suggest.

Joe said...

Thanks for the reply and I concur.

Upon reflection, I think even on policy grounds an appropriate regulation would cover all types of funeral ceremonies, so that permission even for a secular event.

My views are somewhat colored by the understanding that there are certain events that have a sacred character, that involve questions of conscience, even when expressed in a way not typically seen as religious.

Birth and deaths are of this caliber and the regulation should cover all, including those which most would deem secular.

Griya Mobil Kita said...

Nice article, thanks for the information. rental mobil jakarta

Isabella said...

True grit is making a decision and standing by it,doing what must be done.



_____________________________________
Tera Online
Runescape Gold
Tera Gold

Tera Gold
Buy Runescape Gold
Tera Item

Tera Gold Cheap
cheap wow gold
Tera Account

Tera Items
cheapest wow gold
Tera Gold

Cheap Tera Gold
Runescape Gold
lotro gold

teraonline for sale said...

I prefer headlines that create a little controversy, I always find myself clicking on titles that are imaginative out of curiosity. Many best players know some online game. Here useful link:Tera Gold
cheap rs gold cheap wow gold Tera account WOW gold

Blud Bitter said...

英文seo The view problem is serious but I think a situation could be created that there is something precisely essential about spiritual articles here. But, from the post alone there doesn't even seem to be such a series. The debate might have increased over that problem, but it isn't the only factor choice is necessary for. WOW Gold

wedding dress said...

Thanks for reading and letting me know what you think, guys! And a big thank you to INTERN for inviting me to share!What about an escape from mortal trifling and desire? For the heavenly pleasure, we recommend you the planning of a wedding dresses 2012 exploration. Sensation

is triggered, as we seek to blend the diversified local elements into the current practice of destination wedding dresses.Resembling a surprised bumping into the treasure chest of Amber’s vintage wedding dress, new continents in the lover’s world are ready to be

discovered.

butoijoh said...

Thank you for an excellent weblog !! I discovered some useful information and will suggest your blog for all my buddies.
parfum | jakarta hotel | rumah dijual | perlengkapan bayi | properti semarang | mesin fotocopy | party organizer | rental forklift

johnson said...

Sometimes you can find unique recipes www.arm2teeth.com here which lead to your achievements which are based on how many different things you can cook.. Even if you don't need them right away runescape money

de wo said...

I think this is a much more difficult problem than you suggest and one which readily crosses conventional political lines.

_______________
FIFA 13 coins
buy gw2 gold

Ellina Lee said...

We realized using their company E-sports venture to a lot of transferring space (from your design and style staff GW2 Gold, you will find that to remain watching a number of electronic sports activities send out or even are living), and it has been working together with us all within the "battle" supplementary for the Almost everything blended Cheap D3 Gold.

sse said...

This is a good idea of giving people the opportunity to find business in thoe areas in no time and easy way. Thanks for having this site created for it gives a hope to all who seek for it. bypassing the Great Firewall of China

sse said...

I have found this article very exciting. Do you have any others on this topic? I am also sending it to my friend to enjoy your writing style. Thanks for sharing. herbal incense

Biometric Solution said...

It is good to see some detailed information on this topic which is very rarely discussed on the internet. Thanks for this pretty useful share. Mesin Absensi Yogyakarta

Upton said...

Murdered: SuspectSi Soul Square Enix a few days ago on a trailer unveiled its buy 2007 gold mysterious Murdered: Suspect Soul has not been until now that have reported what the development team is in charge of juego.Airtight Games, known for his work on Quantum Conundrum and Dark Void, are taking charge of the degree of mystery and research that puts us in the shoes of a spirit that seeks to runescape gold old school unravel the mysteries of his own muerte.Murdered: Suspect Soul will launch next year on PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, and will be shown in greater detail during E3 in Los Angeles.M s buy old school gold news: Murdered: Suspect Soul, E3 2013

Timbaland said...

Hanging in the hallway at Whites High School in Lord Of The Rings Online Gold Wabash, Ind., and Lotro Gold the basketball team pictures from the past 40 years. A player in the center of the front row in each picture holds a basketball identifying Lord Of The Rings Online Gold the year -"62-63", "63-64", "64-65", etc. One day I spotted a freshman looking curiously at the photos. Turning to me, he said, "Isn't it strange how the teams always lost by one point?"

Timbaland said...

Jim walked into a store which had a sign Rift Gold outside: "Second-hand clothes bought and sold." He was carrying an old pair of pants and asked the owner of the store, "How Rift Platinum much will you give me for these?" The man looked at them and then said rudely, "Two dollars." "What!" said Jim. "I had guessed they were worth at least five." "No," said the man, "they aren't worth a rift gold penny more than two dollars."

muhammad waqas said...


Welcome i am kavin, its my first event to remarking anyplace, when i read this article i supposed i could likewise make remark because of this splendid article. essay writing service by tigers! Only the best writers, only the best quality! 100% non-plagiarized essays, free quotes and awesome discounts.

朱小妮 said...

Wholesale Cheap Sexy Lingerie, Halloween Costumes, Clubwear And Corsets Manufacturers From China Suppliers.
Flapper Costumes
Wholesale Sexy Clubwear
Vintage Dresses