Monday, March 01, 2010

Game Change

By Mike Dorf

Herewith, a few thoughts on the ever-so-engrossing Game Change, which I just finished reading:

1) Most of the mainstream discussion of the book has focused on various revelations of dysfunctional marriages and gaffes, the gaffiest of these being Harry Reid's "Negro dialect" comment--which, interestingly, is not presented in the book as a gaffe at all but simply matter-of-factly in the discussion of how the Senate Democratic establishment moved to Obama because of fears that Hillary Clinton would lose the general election. The bulk of the book is instead a re-telling of the race that is extremely familiar to anyone who was following it closely (okay, obsessively) at the time. What makes Game Change so entertaining is that the reader gets to relive these moments from the inside of the various campaigns.

2) As the title suggests, the theme of the book is how various events were game changers: The Obama team out-organizing the Clinton team in Iowa; Clinton's tearing up on the eve of the NH primary; Charlie Crist's non-endorsement of Giuliani; the selection of Palin; the Katie Couric interviews; and for the authors, most importantly, the contrast between Obama's sober engagement with, and McCain's gimmicky reaction to, the financial crisis in the week and a half between the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the first Presidential debate. I don't disagree that each of these events felt like a game changer at the time--and the events that bore on the intra-party contests almost certainly were quite important. However, the very notion of a game changer in a Presidential election runs contrary to pretty entrenched conventional wisdom in political science: That a relatively small number of factors such as the state of the economy, which party holds the White House, and the public mood together determine the outcome of nearly all such elections. Only when these factors point weakly in one or the other direction can such matters as candidates' personalities and all of the minutiae on which campaigns focus make much of a difference.

3) And yet, reliving the election through Game Change, it is hard to swallow the conventional wisdom. Suppose Obama had stayed out in 2008, as he almost did, and that Edwards, with his superior Iowa ground game, emerged as the alternative to Clinton. He might have wrapped up the nomination quickly. Then, he could have continued denying paternity of Rielle Hunter's baby for months, only to have it confirmed after he became the nominee. Is it so hard to imagine McCain winning the election under these circumstances--especially if he had chosen a more conventional running mate?

4) What I mean to be raising here--and what the book very nicely illustrates--is the fact that history is made by the combination of large impersonal forces and path-dependent quirks of fate and personality.

5) My biggest disappointment in the book was its failure to mention (and therefore its failure to delve into what lay behind) what I thought were two of Joe Biden's high and low points. High: When he skewered Rudy Giuliani as defining a sentence as "a noun, a verb, and 9/11." Low (other than the "clean" comment that smothered his candidacy in its crib): When he appeared to threaten to shoot his running mate if he "messed with" Biden's shotguns.

6) Meanwhile, the best tidbit that I learned (spoiler alert) was McCain's exasperated response when asked during debate prep if he knew the difference between a gay marriage and a civil union. McCain snapped, "I don't give a fuck." Let's give McCain the benefit of the doubt and assume that he did know the difference but really just didn't care. After all, he was the vastly better informed half of the Republican ticket. Sarah Palin couldn't explain to her debate prep team why North and South Korea are two different countries.


michael a. livingston said...

I voted for Obama, despite disagreeing with him on virtually every issue, because I became convinced--after seeing McCain twice in person--that he had a very shaky understanding of almost every domestic policy issue. The clincher came when, at a McCain-Palin rally, several people started to leave after Palin's speech. "But McCain hasn't spoken yet," I protested. "We've seen what we came for," they responded. And so they had.

goodsasa33 said...





 大哥大訊號強波器  網站SEO



每当遇见你 said...

Here’s a list of tools you will need to start: Jewelers’pandora jewellery wire cutters - If you can only afford one pair, get memory wire shears. pandora charms These are designed to make clean cuts on tough memory wire, so can also be used for pandora charms uk softer wires. Chain-nose pliers sometimes called cheap pandora charms needle-nose pliers – Very versatile for picking up and grasping small items, pandora charms sale bending eye pins, closing jumps rings, even closing crimp beads. discount pandora charms Round-nose pliers – Used for creating loops on beaded head and eye pins. Can also be used for winding your own jump rings and as the second pliers you’cheap pandora ll need for closing jump rings. Optional pliers – Wire-looping pliers which have several graduated circumferences to allow you to form perfectly uniform jump rings and loops in place of the pandora discount uk round-nose pliers mentioned above. Crimping pliers which have little notches to allow you to both flatten a crimp bead and then bend it to form a rounded finished look instead of the flat crimp you pandora uk get using the chain-nose pliers. As for materials, I recommend some assortment packs of beads in coordinating colors, some decorative metal spacers, seed beads in both silver and gold These can serve as spacers and beautifully set off pandora sale your other beads., tube-shaped crimp beads Buy the best you can find – these are what hold it all together!, head and eye pins. Other than that, let your choice of project be your guide. You might want some silver or pewter charms.

Coach Bags & Chanel Handbags said...

Even if one thinks that it's okay for the government to order everyone to see the doctor, an order to exercise does appear to go to far. It looks a lot like conscription, which, if justified in wartime, is still extraordinary. Further, it is not clear how a mandatory exercise regime could possibly be enforced absent something like Orwellian surveillance.

cheap wow gold
Tera gold
Tera account
Tera gold
Runescape gold

chengnuo said...

Love you, think of you, love you secretly, eagerly love you, wait, feel disappointed,
try hard, lose, and feel sad, go apart, and recall.All of these are for sake of you.
And I will never regret for it. WOW Gold
Cheap WOW Gold
RS Gold
RS Gold

chengnuo said...

The more you wanna know whether you have forgotten something, the better you remember;
I once heard that, the only thing you can do when you no longer have something is not to forget
WOW Gold
Cheap WOW Gold
RS Gold
RS Gold

cheaptera said...

I know Craig Becker, Faculty of Law. I have not seen in years, but I bet a lot of money you have (i) very well qualified, and (ii) very liberal. I do not know what it tells you about a filibuster, but certainly not on the basis of his being incompetent.Tera gold
cheap wow gold
Runescape gold

lotro gold
buy Runescape gold
Tera gold

cinderaller said...

The clincher came when, at a McCain-Palin rally, several people started to leave after Palin's speech. "But McCain hasn't spoken yet," I protested. "We've seen what we came for," they responded.

Buy RS Gold
Cheap Eden Gold
Buy WOW Gold
Tera Money
Tera Gold

teragoldd said...

4rsgold said...

So much has been said of late about Goldman Sachs the cambridge satchel|satchel cambridge|cambridge satchel|cambridge satchel co|the cambridge satchel company|cambridge satchel bag|cambridge satchel company bag|cambridge leather satchel|cheap uggs|英文seo

cherry said...

cambridge satchel are very fashion, now they have become a popular fashion trend. You will like cambridge backpack very much. ugg boot cambridge satchel company satchel cambridge