Thursday, December 03, 2009

Public Skepticism About Higher Education

-- Posted by Neil H. Buchanan

My latest FindLaw column extends my recent discussion of public investment, focusing specifically on public investment in higher education. I attempt to make the case for spending on top-flight universities as a necessary condition for economic prosperity, and I point out that we are currently allowing the states' budget crises to gut one of the nation's most important assets (and the source of one of our biggest competitive advantages internationally). Given the importance of universities to the country, and given the perversely pro-cyclical nature of states' spending, I conclude that the federal government should fund the nations' universities to prevent their further decline. (I did not have the space to talk about the "fund nationally, manage locally" issue, but that seems the most sensible and appealing approach.)

The column relies on some unstated factual assumptions about the size of the payoff to investment in public higher education, assumptions that I intend to discuss in future columns. Here, I thought it an opportune moment to discuss why it is so difficult to sell the public on the value of higher education.

I was tempted to title this post "Why Do They Hate Us?" referring to the public's apparent disdain for academics; but that seemed likely to draw the wrong audience for this post. Nevertheless, it is perhaps not exaggerating too much to describe the public's attitude toward college professors as downright hostile.

Part of the reason, I suspect, is that hiring people specifically because they are qualified for "mind work" is unnerving. It cannot help but trigger fears of inferiority -- fears that are not allayed by the arrogant attitude that too often comes with advanced degrees. It is a more general version of the sketches earlier this decade on Saturday Night Live in which Jimmy Fallon plays "your company's computer guy," answering every tech problem with rolling eyes and an order to "MOVE!" away from the computer so that he can fix what his pea-brained supplicant has broken. We might need guys like him, and we might appreciate that he does a highly competent job. But we cannot stand him.

A more specific source of public hostility to the professoriate is the belief that we do not work very much. Even liberal Democrats who claim to support higher education have gone on rants about how little work professors do. Former Congresswoman Pat Schroeder of Colorado, for example, made the evening news about twenty years ago during hearings on higher education when she expressed amazement and disgust that professors "only work six hours a week." This is, of course, logically equivalent to measuring a member of Congress's working hours by how long it takes to vote on various bills, but no matter. The idea is apparently fixed in the public's mind that a professor's life is simply a matter of giving lectures from yellowed notes and then retiring to the faculty lounge to drink sherry and feel superior to others.

Surprisingly, this misunderstanding about what professors do is shared even by people whom we might expect to have a more nuanced view. A public school teacher once asked me to explain what I did other than teach my classes. One item on my list was reviewing textbooks for possible use in my courses. She objected that this does not do anything for my students in the semester that I actually read the books for possible future use. No matter how much I tried to explain that this was actually work, and that it had to count at some point on the ledger of "what professors do," she was unmoved. She, after all, "worked" 35 hours a week and had to grade papers for her current students as well. What was my complaint?

I thus would despair of ever explaining the value of "service" work for the university or profession. For example, this is one of the crunch weeks for me in organizing scholarly panels at the Law & Society Association's annual meetings. The total amount of time that I spend on this activity each year is, when I add it all up, surprisingly high. But I do it voluntarily, right? And what real good am I doing? What comes of a bunch of tax professors sitting around and talking in a conference room? Doesn't sound like real work, does it?

I think that we might also seem suspicious in the public mind because, to put it simply, we love our jobs. When I was a graduate student teaching undergraduate courses, I enjoyed what I was doing so much that I actually felt guilty when I cashed my paycheck. If we are so happy, then maybe we are being overpaid and underworked, right? Of course, plenty of people outside of academia would actually work for a lower salary than they receive. (I'm talkin' 'bout you, Wall Street!) If one believes in competitive labor markets, however, the salaries of college professors are set in response to the salaries available in alternative jobs. Professors in med schools, law schools, and business schools earn the most (but still much less than they could earn in non-university jobs, as a matter of compensating differentials for the fact that being a professor is actually a fulfilling job with a great deal of personal autonomy); professors in humanities departments earn much less. In some cases, in fact, the lowest-paid professors in even a great university are earning, at most, a solidly middle-class salary but putting in much more than forty hours a week.

Academics have been struggling with this problem for as long as there have been academics. If we do not start to change public attitudes at least a bit, the public will continue to underfund our institutions. That means that they are underfunding their children's path to a better life and the country's future prosperity. This cannot continue.

14 comments:

Michael C. Dorf said...

Great post, Neil. Let's meet in the faculty lounge to discuss it over glasses of port after I've taught my 55 minute class today.
;-)

Neil H. Buchanan said...

Yes, let's do.

Paul Scott said...

http://www.dorfonlaw.org/2009/11/religious-left-part-1-universal.html

different, somehow?

Jonathan Noble said...

The rise of think tanks, armed with their own experts and academics, have challenged the dominance of universities. Many people today view universities as simply one of many competing authorities in the marketplace of ideas. No wonder academics have lost respect!

Carey said...

I'd add to this list of reasons the perception (justified or not) that the professoriate professes wacky opinions that are at odds with what "normal people" believe. I.e., that the professoriate is too left-wing.

Believe this, and you're unlikely to think your tax money should be funding professors. Even if you don't buy into the whole sherry-drinking myth.

狗熊克星 said...

推廣創意客家藍衫 盼量產.普及化 創新客家藍衫的設計,不再是舞台展示效果催眠,行政院客家委員會,最近辦催眠理〞南客風情〞,客家翻譯社流行服飾翻譯社行銷及推廣活動,選出六堆地區優秀的,2遠雄人壽位客家服飾工作者,製作40套手工果醬男女創新客家服,這些創意客家服飾,法拍法拍來可望能夠投入成衣市場量法拍產,供一融資般大眾選購、參考。
融資
大膽的融資剪裁,讓客家酒店經紀藍衫格外顯眼,這是屏科大,時酒店經紀尚設計與管理系學外遇生,以〞客家傳統與創新〞外遇〞為專題外遇,所設計製作的客家服飾,不過尋人要穿出去逛街可尋人不適合。
副教104授 柯雪琴:『客104家本身要延104續這個設計,賣金買賣並不是賣金買賣那麼容易老實說,飛梭雷射飛梭雷射在這個客家板塊裡面,它要怎們把元飛梭雷射素活化成,讓現代人又能隆乳夠接受,其實是隆乳滿高難度的。』
在眾隆乳隆乳參賽的作品當中,這套不對稱剪裁的創新藍衫,除了布扣以外,衣服補丁的設計,說明客家勤儉的精神,褲子則是小女生最喜歡的泡泡褲,作品最受歡迎。
學生葉琪馨:『就是很可愛啊!,想到和同學去逛街休閒的時刻,就會穿這套衣服出去,就會覺得自己與眾不同。』
會想讓人想穿上街,讓這件作品,得到評審第一名的評價,同時第二名也是屏科大的學生,夢幻的蓬蓬裙設計,就有民眾想要訂購。
學生 李佳芳:『我覺得很高興如果說做成,像是一般的衣服來穿的話,我想也是滿適合的。』
學生的創意,不僅受到評審青睞,也得到了一般民眾的認可,讓原本只供參賽的創意客家服飾能夠普及化,目前也有廠商有意願投入量產,供一般大眾選購和製作,創意設計也為客家服飾,打開了另一道經濟命脈。

Hattie said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Alena

http://grantsforeducation.info

gaohui said...

If you're a plus size woman you've probably Moncler noticed that the majority of coats in stores today are moncler veste designed with women that are supposed to be moncler doudoune shaped like a toothpick. It can be difficult to moncler hommes find a coat that not only looks good but also doesn't break the moncler femmes bank. Coats typically cost a lot of money so it's in your doudoune moncler femmes best interest to shop wisely.A lot of women doudoun moncler hommes make the mistake of only thinking about their dress doudoune moncler femmes or skirt when putting together an doudoune moncler hommes outfit. However, it's important to keep in mind that the majoriy of moncler-gilet people are going to see you with a coat on.

ecco cai said...

An important tips for success with info programs is meeting the needs of your audience. Consider what your audience hopes to know, maybe, just how! Next, take an inventory of product ideas. For example, a photographer could write a unique number of taking flattering pictures, a pet fanatic could write an investigation about first-aid for pets or even a gardener could write information on plant care inside wintertime.
mulberry bags
mulberry bayswater
mulberry bags sale
mulberry uk sale

白白 said...

婦幼徵信社-外遇
徵信社首選南愛徵信社
抓姦│偵探│私家偵探-成功徵信社
離婚|徵信婦幼有限公司
徵信-中華民國徵信專業經理人協會
徵信社首選大愛徵信社
中華民國工商經濟市場調查徵信協會
奇美徵信社
抓姦|離婚專業服務
外遇.大老婆徵信社
兩岸徵信社
海峽偵探│偵探社
偵探│私家偵探 推薦婦幼徵信
抓姦-專業大陸抓姦達網
婚姻挽回協助所
外遇|抓姦追蹤器
MONEY徵信社專業調查
外遇|MONEY帳款催收部
徵信器材網
鴻海徵信社
徵信社品質保障關懷協會推薦-遠傳徵信社
外遇-債務催收徵信社
外遇調查哨|外遇
鴻海徵信社
大統徵信
警民徵信

白白 said...

婦幼徵信社-外遇
徵信社首選南愛徵信社
抓姦│偵探│私家偵探-成功徵信社
離婚|徵信婦幼有限公司
徵信-中華民國徵信專業經理人協會
徵信社首選大愛徵信社
中華民國工商經濟市場調查徵信協會
奇美徵信社
抓姦|離婚專業服務
外遇.大老婆徵信社
兩岸徵信社
海峽偵探│偵探社
偵探│私家偵探 推薦婦幼徵信
抓姦-專業大陸抓姦達網
婚姻挽回協助所
外遇|抓姦追蹤器
MONEY徵信社專業調查
外遇|MONEY帳款催收部
徵信器材網
鴻海徵信社
徵信社品質保障關懷協會推薦-遠傳徵信社
外遇-債務催收徵信社
外遇調查哨|外遇
鴻海徵信社
大統徵信
警民徵信

白白 said...

婦幼徵信社-外遇
徵信社首選南愛徵信社
抓姦│偵探│私家偵探-成功徵信社
離婚|徵信婦幼有限公司
徵信-中華民國徵信專業經理人協會
徵信社首選大愛徵信社
中華民國工商經濟市場調查徵信協會
奇美徵信社
抓姦|離婚專業服務
外遇.大老婆徵信社
兩岸徵信社
海峽偵探│偵探社
偵探│私家偵探 推薦婦幼徵信
抓姦-專業大陸抓姦達網
婚姻挽回協助所
外遇|抓姦追蹤器
MONEY徵信社專業調查
外遇|MONEY帳款催收部
徵信器材網
鴻海徵信社
徵信社品質保障關懷協會推薦-遠傳徵信社
外遇-債務催收徵信社
外遇調查哨|外遇
鴻海徵信社
大統徵信
警民徵信

王小布 said...

婦幼徵信社-外遇
徵信社首選南愛徵信社
抓姦│偵探│私家偵探-成功徵信社
離婚|徵信婦幼有限公司
徵信-中華民國徵信專業經理人協會
徵信社首選大愛徵信社
中華民國工商經濟市場調查徵信協會
奇美徵信社
抓姦|離婚專業服務
外遇.大老婆徵信社
兩岸徵信社
海峽偵探│偵探社
偵探│私家偵探 推薦婦幼徵信
抓姦-專業大陸抓姦達網
婚姻挽回協助所
外遇|抓姦追蹤器
MONEY徵信社專業調查
外遇|MONEY帳款催收部
徵信器材網
鴻海徵信社
徵信社品質保障關懷協會推薦-遠傳徵信社
外遇-債務催收徵信社
外遇調查哨|外遇
鴻海徵信社
大統徵信
警民徵信

aryh884 aryh884 said...

台中徵信社價格,合法徵信社,感情挽回,外遇,財務公司
徵信協會 ,合法徵信社,免費法律諮詢,外遇徵兆,
台中徵信社,免費諮詢律師,徵信社工作,徵信,外遇問題,抓姦,合格徵信社,徵信社工作
心理醫生,捉姦,新竹徵信社,徵信社收費,徵信公司
基隆徵信社,女人徵信社,尋人徵信社,女人徵信社,合法徵信社,外遇徵兆,法律諮詢免費
外遇搜證,徵信社推薦,尋人啟事,徵信社工作,台中徵信社,女人徵信社
蒐證,徵信,桃園徵信社,婚外情,法律諮詢
徵信社工作,財產徵信,第三者,尋人查址
彰化徵信社,台中徵信,免費法律諮詢,政府立案徵信社,出軌
合法徵信社,法律諮詢,小三,律師,婚姻挽回,徵信社價格
台中徵信公司,通姦,離婚,婚姻,感情挽回
外遇解析,女人徵信社,外遇抓姦,法律諮詢服務,
免費法律諮詢,外遇蒐證
外遇抓姦