Could Mike Johnson Foil a Democratic House Victory? Yes, But Only With Help from the Supreme Court and/or Red States
Inspired and aided by President Trump, Republicans have been pursuing multiple pathways to give themselves advantages in the upcoming midterm elections. In that endeavor, they have been assisted by their Republican-appointed allies at the Supreme Court. Yesterday the Court issued a per curiam opinion in Trump v. California allowing the administration to proceed with its plan to use the Post Office to foil mail-in voting. Although the decision purports not to be on the merits, it necessarily is--because likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm are, as the Court acknowledges, key to winning a stay. Yet, as Justice Jackson explains in dissent, the president has no lawful authority to regulate elections absent a delegation from Congress, which he has not received. Trump v. California is hardly the only example of the Supreme Court's faux-naïveté in the service of Trump. The past Term's decision in Louisiana v. Callais ( further ) gutted the Voting Ri...