Tuesday, October 04, 2011

Rules, Standards, Objective Tests, Subjective Tests, and Football

By Mike Dorf


During Sunday's NFL football game between the NY Giants and the Arizona Cardinals, Giants receiver Victor Cruz appeared to fumble and the Cardinals appeared to recover.  However, the referees ruled that Cruz had relinquished the football only after having "given himself up."  Apparently, Rule 7, Section 2, Article 1 states that once a runner declares himself down by falling to the ground, or kneeling, and making no effort to advance, the play is dead.  Cruz, in the mistaken belief that he had been tackled did that, the referees stated, so the ball was dead.  I want to use this case as an entree into a very brief discussion of the relation between two sets of dichotomies: 1) Rules versus Standards; and 2) Objective versus Subjective tests.


But first, a clarification.  I am reporting what the Rule "apparently" states because the NFL only makes available a "digest" of the rules, rather than the complete rules themselves.  I took the above description from a news story describing the controversy.  It's possible that the rule as exactly written raises different issues.


Okay, now onto the controversy.  A number of commentators have criticized the NFL policy on two grounds: (1) Whether a player has given himself up is a vague standard; and (2) Application of that standard turns on the player's subjective mental state, which is impossible to discern.  Both are legitimate points, although both could be countered by pointing to the vices of the alternatives: (1) An attempt to formulate a more precise rule would end up being both over and under-inclusive, as rules often are; and (2) an attempt to discern "objective" intent would require a somewhat hypothetical inquiry into such imponderables as whether a reasonable player in the circumstances at issue would have been giving himself up if he acted as the actual player did.


I don't have a strong view--or really any view--about whether the standard at issue is appropriate.  I do have a view about the debate over it, and it is this: The question of whether to govern by rules or standards is a distinct question from whether to use an objective or a subjective standard of intent.  It is possible to use a standard like "reasonable force is permitted in self-defense" in a way that links to either an objective or a subjective test.  E.g., the reasonableness of force will be judged based on the perspective of a reasonable person (objective) versus the reasonableness of force will be judged based on the perspective of the actual person (subjective).  The same is true for rules.  E.g., whether a categorical rule prohibiting knowingly causing the death of another without justification or excuse could be measured by the knowledge we would impute to a reasonable person (objective) or based on what the actual person knew (subjective).


Despite the analytical separability of the rules/standards and objective/subjective dichotomies, in practice, the sort of person who favors rules will tend, other things being equal, to favor objective tests.  (E.g., Justice Scalia).  That is because standards and subjective tests can feel squishy and, well, subjective.  But the association I am noting here is probably more psychological than logical.  Logic would allow one to think that in some circumstances it makes sense to pair a rule with a subjective test or a standard with an objective one.

12 comments:

CJColucci said...

Perhaps ball-carriers should be trained to end a play by holding onto the ball until they can hand it to an official?

Tantallonblog said...

Excellent post; excellent example

Tantallonblog said...

Excellent post; excellent example. Tks

Kattie said...

21
系統櫃
旅館
除白蟻
老酒收購
SEO
老酒
扭力板手
納豆
倉儲物流
百達翡麗
勞力士
牙醫診所

22
整形
眼袋
隆鼻
隆乳
拉皮
SEO
抽脂
雙眼皮
玻尿酸
果凍矽膠
熱水器
瑜珈課程

Kattie said...

7
整形
隆乳
雙眼皮
雷射溶脂
裝潢
網頁設計
民宿
香港旅館
老鼠
跳蚤
除白蟻
牙醫診所

8
老酒
倉儲物流
隔熱紙
塑膠棧板
抓漏
網頁設計
歐米茄
江詩丹頓
熱水器
扭力板手
整形
牙醫診所

Joe said...

Spam alert.

Shelia Smithson said...

WOW Gold
Perhaps ball-carriers should be qualified to end a have fun with by keeping onto the soccer tennis ball until they can palm it to an official?seo博客 英文seo

Paley Rene said...

I am reporting what the Rule "apparently" states because the NFL only makes available a "digest" of the rules, rather than the complete rules themselves. I took the above description from a news story describing the controversy. It's possible that the rule as exactly written raises different issues.Buy Windows 7 Key
Windows 7 professional product Key
Windows 7 ultimate activation Key

wasirdenature said...

nanah keluar dari penis penyakit penis keluar nanah obat penis keluar nanah cara menngobati kencing nanah pada pria herbal gonore cara mengobati kelamin keluar nanah kencing perih dan keluar nanah

herbal medicine said...

nanah keluar dari penis penyakit penis keluar nanah obat penis keluar nanah cara menngobati kencing nanah pada pria herbal gonore cara mengobati kelamin keluar nanah kencing perih dan keluar nanah

obat herbal said...

obat wasir alami obat wasir alami obat wasir alami kutil kelamin pada wanita obat herpes simplex obat herpes anak obat kemaluan keluar nanah obat kencing nanah di samarinda obat wasir herbal obat wasir herbal obat wasir herbal

obat herbal said...

Obat kencing Nanah De Nature Obat Herbal obat Kutil Kelaminobat wasir resep ampuh obat wasir paling mujarab obat wasir herbal tradisional obat wasir yang untuk ibu hamil