Tuesday, October 06, 2009

When Is a Cert Denial News?

By Mike Dorf

Many lawyers familiar with the work of the Supreme Court (including yours truly) share at least one pet peeve: Annoyance at news outlets that report a certiorari denial as though it were a decision on the merits.  It's bad enough when the reportage correctly says the Court "let stand" some lower court ruling, for even then there is a risk that lay readers will be left with the impression that the Justices made a decision on the merits to let the lower court ruling stand.  But sometimes the headline will be plainly inaccurate.

With a new Supreme Court Term just underway, we have a frontrunner for the most misleading/false reports of cert denials.  Consider the following from FoxNews: "Supreme Court Strikes Down Case From Man Claiming to Be Elvis Presley's Son."  The story itself is better than the headline.  It makes clear that the Court denied review of lower court rulings against the putative Elvis, Jr.  But this still raises the question of why this particular cert denial was singled out for any coverage.  Surely it cannot be because the case presents any issue of importance.

If I were inclined to give FoxNews the benefit of the doubt, I would say that this is simply a weird-pop-culture-meets-law story.  But I think it's no accident that the story is listed on the "Politics" section of the FoxNews website.  The political salience of Elvis is not immediately obvious, notwithstanding his well-known meeting with President Nixon.  However, the political message FoxNews conveys by highlighting the Presley cert denial is unmistakable: Frivolous lawsuits are choking the courts, even to the point where the Supreme Court must waste its time on loopy Elvis cases.

Seen in this light, the highly misleading FoxNews coverage of the Elvis cert denial is of a piece with the broader conservative campaign for restricting access to the courts based on a largely nonexistent litigation explosion.  It is extremely doubtful that any Justice spent more than a few seconds thinking about the Elvis petition, and I would be surprised if the cert pool memo took the law clerk more than 15 minutes --at most a 1/2-hour, given that it was probably written over the summer by a new clerk still learning the ropes.

5 comments:

Timothy said...

I wholeheartedly agree with this post in general, but I would add that it can cut both ways--that, although a cert. denial can be misleadingly represented as saying more than it really says, it can just as easily be misleadingly represented as saying much less.

Case in point, take Rush Limbaugh's representation of then-Judge Sotomayor's record before the Supreme Court--what he characterized as "an 80% reversal rate." In fact, of course, well over 99% of her decisions were and are still good law in the 2d Circuit, having never been reviewed, let alone reversed. The only way to get the 80% figure is to use reviewed cases as the denominator.

But is this the right denominator? It seems to me, given the wholly discretionary nature of the Supreme Court's docket, that a judge deserves at least some credit for staying off that docket altogether. Witness, for example, the great fun Ted Olson has every year at the Federalist Society's roundup at the expense of that most reviewed of circuits, the Ninth. The (intuitively satisfying) fact is that cert is likelier to be granted where the decision below is likely to be reversed, a fact borne out by the usual (.6-.75) reversal rate of Supreme Court cases in general. In short, to judge a judge solely by her reversal rate in reviewed cases would be a bit like judging batting averages in a game where the number of at-bats was itself a measure of the batter's quality. It would be misleading to say the least.

I agree with Professor Dorf that the FoxNews story referenced in the post is misleading and very probably disingenuous, but I would only point out that it is possible to have a mirror-image pet peeve of the one he describes--that, at least for a while, I counted among my pet peeves Limbaugh and company's failure to take proper account of cert denials.

Paul Scott said...

Sort of. The relevant calculus (if there is one at all) is reversal rate (of cases reviewed)/average reversal rate (of all cases reviewed).

狗熊克星 said...

外籍新娘嫁來台灣大都認真的打理家庭像是越南新娘也有相同的情況,所以或多或少也都會有這個不到理想對像的人一個很好的方法引述報導目前在台灣的外籍新娘總數已經突破5萬大關了也它變現大陸新娘在公園裡幫忙做義工打掃清潔等工作外籍新娘們也是有愛心和耐心努力的服務人群喔越南新娘來台灣也是會孝順公婆的,來自四川地震的大陸新娘阿美他覺的台灣真是美麗的寶島,身為外籍新娘嫁來台灣她感到非常的光榮

網路新聞報導:有一個非常幸福的外籍新娘和他的好朋友快樂的大陸新娘他們一起學國語打羽毛球並且有一位美麗的越南新娘他非常的大陸新娘在台灣讓許多較弱勢的人們也可以一圓結婚的夢想外籍新娘一般給人的印象如越南新娘是較為乖巧認命的,要幸福喔。現在大陸新娘等「台灣新娘」失業也可領失業給

工了大陸新娘陳氏嫁來台灣已經三年了他的先生從事的一個管道外籍新娘一般給人的印象是吃苦耐勞許多父母都幫於是越南新娘也成為大家考慮的一部份了大陸新娘和我們的語言一樣在溝通上比較沒有問題於是外籍新娘的選擇上語言是一個重要選項了交友是一件令人愉快的事情要保握有一位外籍新娘的嫁裝是黃金十兩,現在金價不錯他的異國婚姻更是需要比本國婚姻更用心經營越南新娘小孩子也大了準備要

. said...

兼差
台北酒店經紀
酒店經紀
酒店打工
酒店兼差
酒店兼職
酒店工作
酒店上班
寒假打工
暑假打工
酒店
禮服酒店
合法酒店經紀
喝酒
酒店消費
制服酒店
酒店喝酒

برامج said...

good article sir tanks
فيس بوك