Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Should Rapists of Children Be Executed?

I have a column posted today on FindLaw's Writ discussing the oral argument in Kennedy v. Louisiana, a case that poses the question whether executing rapists of children violates the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments. In my column, I focus on some of the revealing questions posed by the Justices in their attempts to determine the stare decisis significance of an earlier case, Coker v. Georgia , in which the Supreme Court struck down the death penalty for the rape of adult women. Here, I wish to focus on a different aspect of the case that came up in oral argument: the Eighth Amendment principle that prohibits the granting of excessive discretion to a sentencing body determining whether to impose capital punishment on a particular defendant.

In Furman v. Georgia, a case that had the effect of declaring all existing death penalty laws unconstitutional, the Supreme Court said that a judge or jury in charge of capital sentencing must be given more guidance than simply: here is a person convicted of murder; you decide whether to sentence him to imprisonment or death. Giving the sentencer so much discretion, held the Court, creates a circumstance in which the receipt of the death penalty is like a "lightning strike," utterly unpredictable and without a rationally coherent account. The classification of existing capital sentencing as arbitrary in this way stemmed, in part, from the fact that most people convicted of murder and eligible for a death sentence were actually sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Those unlucky few who did receive the death penalty, moreover, were not distinct in the heinousness of their crimes. Judges and juries were therefore using arbitrary factors to decide which murderers should live and which should die. A legitimate sentencing scheme would constrain such discretion and guide judges and juries in what sorts of facts to take into account in making the decision. Following the ruling in Furman, states rewrote their capital sentencing laws and, in Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court upheld capital sentencing that provided jurors with aggravating factors that -- if found -- would distinguish the pool of killers who would, by contrast to the others, be death-eligible.

The reason this "narrowing" principle (requiring that the law narrow the class of death-eligible defendants) is important in Kennedy v. Louisiana is that in those states that provide for the potential execution of rapists of children, almost no convict is actually sentenced to die. It is also true that in those very same states, many more people are convicted of raping children than are convicted of murder. Therefore, the petitioner's attorney ably argued, it follows necessarily from Furman that a statute permitting the execution of anyone who rapes a child grants excessive discretion to jurors to decide which rapists are to live and which are to die. The attorney for Patrick Kennedy suggested, further, that the only factor that currently permits prediction of which child-rapists will find themselves on death row is the failure to plead guilty; that is, the assertion of one's right to trial is the only discernible "aggravating factor" that distinguishes between the the death-eligible rapists of children and all the rest. This argument strikes me as persuasive, particularly because Louisiana (unlike other states that classify child-rape as a capital offense) does not offer any aggravating factors to narrow the class of death-eligible defendants. The degree of discretion is accordingly even greater than that which was invalidated in Furman v. Georgia.

Notwithstanding its apparent persuasive force, however, the only Justice that appeared to engage in very much questioning on this matter was Justice Scalia, who has been very candid about his view that the "narrowing" jurisprudence is utterly wrong and that the Eighth Amendment contains no such a requirement of limiting the sentencer's discretion. He pressed the attorney defending the Louisiana statute on this question, apparently to provide Justice Scalia with ammunition against those on the Court who are not prepared to overrule Furman and its progeny. The attorney's response was to note that the requirement that the jury find that the victim was a child under a particular age narrows the category of crimes sufficiently to satisfy Furman. (In response to this claim, Justice Souter wondered whether it is fair to consider an element of the predicate offense an aggravating factor for purposes of Furman. My thinking is that there is no more than a semantic distinction between a law prohibiting all rape and then classifying victim's age as an aggravating factor, on the one hand, and a law prohibiting rape of children and permitting execution of convicts, on the other. Either the category of death-eligible people is sufficiently narrow to pass muster or it isn't). I suspect that the attorney's answer was inadequate, given that one could as readily characterize murders as cases of armed assault resulting in death with a particularly heinous mental state. If this category is in need of narrowing, then so is the category of rapists of children.

Interestingly, given Mike's recent posts of facial versus as-applied challenges, Justice Kennedy suggested at one point that because Patrick Kennedy, the particular defendant falls into a narrow class of especially serious rapes (he raped an eight-year-old child who was also his own stepdaughter and the rape resulted in extensive vaginal and anal tearing requiring surgery), he was in no position to complain that Louisiana permits the sentencer too much discretion: in his case, there were aggravating facts aplenty. This is, of course, another way of saying that one should not be able to complain about an unconstitutional law unless a properly crafted law would have spared the petitioner the negative outcome in question, here a death sentence. Patrick Kennedy's attorney responded persuasively that the flaw of a statute conveying unbridled discretion to the sentencer may be raised by anyone sentenced to die under that statute. Though a jury might have sentenced Kennedy to die even if instructed under a properly designed law, Kennedy had a right to be judged under such a valid law. This strikes me as correct, in the same way as one could not suggest that an instruction to the jury to find guilt by a preponderance of the evidence would be okay, as applied, in the case of a convict against whom the actual evidence presented was overwhelming.

My prediction is that, assuming the Justices are not prepared to overrule Furman v. Greg, they are likely to hold that the Louisiana statute provides an unconstitutionally broad grant of discretion to the sentencer to determine whether or not a particular defendant should be executed or simply imprisoned. If I am right, then much of the discussion during oral argument in Kennedy tells us more about future cases than about the holding in Kennedy.


Sobek said...

Under your analysis (and still assuming the Court does not overrule Fuhrman), could Louisiana enact a statute the allows the death penalty for child rape if it sets forth factors to be considered, such as (and I'm just spitballing here) the extreme youth of the child, repeat offenses/failure of prior treatments, abusing a position of trust, and unusual physical damage?

Sherry F. Colb said...

Yes, if the Court rules narrowly (as I suspect it will, if my prediction is correct) that there need to be aggravating factors that narrow the class of death eligible convicts. Other states providing for execution of child-rapists actually have the recidivism aggravating factor that you identified (through spitballing, which may be how they arrived at the factor as well). Kennedy's attorney argued also, however, that the death penalty is disproportionate punishment, under the Eighth Amendment, for the rape of a child (just as the Court found it disproportionate punishment for the rape of an adult woman, even under a statute that required aggravating factors) and that therefore, no death penalty statute for child-rape -- even one that narrowed the class -- would pass muster. From Patrick Kennedy's perspective, of course, such a broad ruling is not necessary to his prevailing.

CEP said...

In the tradition of Aldous Huxley's method of taking his exams, I question the question.

A large part of the problem is that the public at large tends to think of the penalty for a criminal offense as being purely to punish the crime, and not to punish the criminal. There certainly is a large overlap, but trying to make a certain kind of crime inherently more deserving of a radically enhanced punishment is inconsistent with accepting that we're dealing not with acts, but with people who commit acts. In this context, there is no good reason to distinguish "children" from "helpless elderly" — except, perhaps, the feel-good factor that one is "protecting" children by providing for the death penalty against people who probably won't be deterred by it.

talitha said...

I'm curious about what is left of the need for narrowing factors anymore. In my state robbery/murder, rape/murder, kidnap/murder, etc. are automatically death eligible w/o further aggravators. How would this be different, apart from the semantic difference of having the "aggravator" appear in both the underlying statute and the aggravation statute?

egarber said...

Has the Supreme Court ever ruled directly on the question of whether the Eighth Amendment allows the death penalty at all for non-murder crimes?

Sherry F. Colb said...

Not directly, no. The language in Coker v. Georgia implies that because rape victims survive, it is disproportionate to execute their rapists. However, there has always been an assumption that traitors may be executed (and Justice Kennedy raised this question about treason at oral argument).

Unknown said...

"Not directly, no. The language in Coker v. Georgia implies that because rape victims survive, it is disproportionate to execute their rapists."
As a victim of child rape, I can tell you, many of us do not "survive", not without spending many thousands of hours and dollars in/on therapy, and even then...
The rapist DID take a life: the adult I should have been- confident, successful and relatively happy.

Anonymous said...

免費A片, ut聊天室, AV女優, 美女視訊, 免費成人影片, 成人論壇, 情色交友, 免費AV, 線上a片, 日本美女寫真集, 同志聊天室, 聊天室交友, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 微風成人區, 色美媚部落格, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, 免費A片, 上班族聊天室, A片,H漫, 18成人, a漫, av dvd, 一夜情聊天室, 微風成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人貼圖, 成人電影, 成人, 中部人聊天室, 080中部人聊天室, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 成人電影, A片, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 成人遊戲, 成人影城, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 成人網站, 麗的色遊戲, 色情網站, 成人論壇, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 自拍, 癡漢, , 俱樂部, 豆豆聊天室, 聊天室, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網影音視訊聊天室 免費視訊聊天室 視訊聊天 視訊交友 美女視訊 視訊美女 視訊 免費視訊 免費視訊聊天 視訊聊天室 辣妹視訊 一夜情 色情a片 aio交友愛情館 情色電影 情色視訊 色情遊戲 色情 情色小說 一葉情貼圖片區 色情小說 色情聊天室 情色交友 成人論壇 成人網站 色情網站 情色論壇 小高聊天室 女同志聊天室 6K聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080聊天室 聊天室尋夢園 UT男同志聊天室 男同志聊天室 尋夢園聊天室 UT聊天室 聊天室 豆豆聊天室 A片 成人電影 成人貼圖 嘟嘟成人網 美女交友 本土自拍 成人交友 成人影片

Anonymous said...

It is the holic gold which makes me very happy these days, my brother says holic money is his favorite games gold he likes, he usually holic online gold to start his game and most of the time he will win the cheap holic gold back and give me some holic online money to play the game.

Anonymous said...

酒店喝酒,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,制服店,便服店,鋼琴酒吧,兼差,酒店兼差,酒店打工,伴唱小姐,暑假打工,酒店上班,日式酒店,舞廳,ktv酒店,酒店,酒店公關,酒店小姐,理容院,日領,龍亨,學生兼差,酒店兼差,酒店上班,酒店打工,禮服酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工,酒店小姐,經紀 彩色爆米花,經紀人 彩色爆米花,酒店傳播,酒店經紀 彩色爆米花,爆米花,童裝,童裝拍賣,童裝大盤,童裝寄賣,童裝批貨,酒店,酒店,童裝切貨,酒店,GAP童裝,酒店,酒店 ,禮服店 , 酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒暑假打工

Anonymous said... .
[url=]puma shoes[/url]
[url=]chaussures puma[/url]
[url=]nike air max ltd[/url]

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店經紀, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店工作, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀, 專業酒店經紀, 合法酒店經紀, 酒店暑假打工, 酒店寒假打工, 酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店工作, 酒店打工經紀, 制服酒店經紀,,

Anonymous said...



(株式会社Catch the Web 横山直広)Catch the Web情報販売2.0セミナー
(井上 博隆)ミクぺたPro mixi足あと自動巡回ツール
QUEST PACK 4in1【田郷 勝彦】
((株)e-FLAGS  楠山高広)アドセンスでシステマチックに稼ぐ最速戦略書 AdSense systematic package
亀丸 圭一郎の情報教材
(中村 明義)mixi専用あしあとツール mixiNavi バージョン3.3 - バックグラウンド処理の時刻指定自動実行機能版
物販サイト作成支援ツール ヴァルカン vulcan(三澤 修)

(福永 亜由美/株式会社メガプロモーション)韓国ドラマをもっと楽しみたいあなたへ~4時間55分の音声でハングル脳がみるみる目覚める!!【超らく韓国語マスター術】
(World Wide Vision 株式会社 和氣布由巳)Score Up 1-2-3 for the TOEIC(R) Test
(奥田 俊雄)暗記と理解が同時にできる一石二鳥の文章暗記法Ver2
澤井 大輔 株式会社 OMコンサルティング 社労士試験合格バイブル~超効率的学習法~

(加藤 良一 整形外科)専門家でも簡単になおらない?? やっかいなテニス肘
(久保裕 株式会社ユニネット)あなたもきっと良くなる!アトピー性皮膚炎を自分で改善する5つの法則
(遠藤 岳)ペニスセルフ増大メソッド『エクササイズ・メソッドオール』
(株式会社KABUTO 藤波孝一)【川俣式整体】 椎間板ヘルニア改善法
竹原 秀明 赤ちゃん・子どもがぐっすり眠る魔法の安眠術

(株式会社 Good Appeal)【復縁マニュアル】女性限定!『復活愛の極意!元カレと寄りを戻す方法』

(アリスエオフィス有末 やよい)メールセミナー『30日で!コワイくらいモテる男に生まれ変わる184の魔法!』

(株式会社 Good Appeal)略奪愛の成功法則-彼氏がいる女をゲットする方法

(中 徳治)櫻井秀勲の復縁マニュアル 男性向け限定版

(高崎 明彦)【 復縁 】 大好きなあの人と復縁できる方法


瀬戸口 理蘭 恋ナビ

(ナレッジカレッジ株式会社 町田ゆういち)【FLS】CD

(井上 鈴乃)略奪!彼氏持ちの女性を自分の彼女にする


(大坪 伸)cabapedia(キャバペディア)~狙ったキャバ嬢を1日で落とす方法~

完全無敵のモテ男計画 松尾 愛

(株式会社KABUTO 藤波孝一)女性を一気に盛り上げ、釘付けにする【ネタ100選】

(大山 誠)会話とメールの全文を丸事パクってもてる男になるプログラム【全額返金保証付き】

日経225先物 「マジックキャンドル10」(株式会社DREAM-CATCHER)

北村 浩 日経先物ミニ BTF投資術

(多賀 俊文)FXで勝利へのMT4テンプレート

(株式会社DREAM-CATCHER)日経225先物 「マジックキャンドル10」

(菅原 博之)3連単確率競馬攻略本

Unknown said...

More for information We know that in the current era you service provider hence each of the Packers and Movers services.
Packers and Movers in Delhi | Movers and Packers Delhi
Packers and Movers in Gurgaon | Movers and Packers Gurgaon
Packers and Movers in Noida | Movers and Packers Noida
Packers and Movers in Ghaziabad | Movers and Packers Ghaziabad
Packers and Movers in Faridabad | Movers and Packers Faridabad

Unknown said...

Thanks for more information What it takes to endow you with Export packing domestic moving and long distance relocation services.
Packers and Movers Pune | Movers and Packers in Pune
Packers and Movers Mumbai | Movers and Packers Mumbai
Packers and Movers Chennai | Movers and Packers in Chennai
Packers and Movers Hyderabad | Movers and Packers in Hyderabad
Packers and Movers Bangalore | Movers and Packers in Bangalore

Unknown said...

Thank you very much for this article.

Movers and Packers in Pune
Movers and Packers in Gurgaon
Movers and Packers in Bangalore

Unknown said...

Thank you very much for this article

Packers and Movers Mumbai
Packers and Movers Navi Mumbai
Packers and Movers Thane
Packers and Movers Ghaziabad
Packers and Movers Faridabad
Packers and Movers Delhi
Packers and Movers Noida