Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Should Felons Vote?

By Mike Dorf

Here's an adage for our times: Any position attributed to a Republican Presidential candidate by supporters of any of his rivals in the hope of making him look insufficiently conservative is likely, upon examination, to prove eminently sensible.  The idea du jour is felon voting.  A super-PAC supporting (but, if following the law, not formally affiliated or acting in coordination with) Mitt Romney, is running ads in South Carolina denouncing Rick Santorum for having supported voting by felons.  Here's the ad, with the bit about felons voting coming at the end:

And here's Santorum and Romney mixing it up during Monday's debate over whether the accusation was fair:

[Embedded video won't run on email, so email subscribers to DOL: Click here and here to view the videos.]

Santorum has two complaints about the ad.  First, as he explained during the debate, it's hypocritical of Romney supporters to call Santorum to task for the ad when Romney, as Massachusetts governor, did not try to change the state law that permitted convicted felons on probation or parole to vote, an even more liberal position than the one Santorum took as a senator.  Romney says he tried to change the law but the Democratic-controlled Massachusetts legislature wouldn't let him and that he's not responsible for what the super-PAC does.  I'll let others referee this aspect of the disagreement.

Second, Santorum says the ad is misleading because, by showing an orange-jumpsuit-clad felon wearing an "I voted" button, it implies that Santorum supported a law that would permit people currently serving in prison to vote, when in fact, Santorum's position was to restore voting rights to ex-felons who had completed their prison terms.  I say, hey, at least the headless jumpsuited felon in the ad is clearly a white guy; that's progress from the days of (the pre-repentant) Lee Atwater and Willie Horton.  Cf. Simpson, Homer ("I'm not just another loudmouth.  I'm a loudmouth who says things you're afraid to say, but not racist things!").

But I digress.  My main point is this: Why shouldn't felons be permitted to vote?  Let's consider the position Romney (currently) espouses: Once someone has committed a felony, he ought never be permitted to vote.  I want to give Romney the benefit of the doubt, so let's assume (consistent with some of his statements on this issue), that he means violent felony, rather than some relatively minor offense that happens to be classified as a felony.  Suppose Snake was convicted of burglary, served three years in the state pen, was paroled, and after several more years has now been released from the supervision of the probation dep't.  What harm could come from Snake voting?

One might imagine that Snake would vote for the elimination of laws protecting private property or even personal safety but there is no real risk that any politician will support such a view.  And if people who want to eliminate the criminal law so that they can commit violent crimes form a near-majority of the population, then civilized society is already a lost cause.

Perhaps the worry is that Snake will support politicians who wish to divert public resources from law enforcement to other priorities (e.g., education, parks, public health), and that support of people such as Snake will be enough, at the margin, to give such policies an unfair advantage.  It's legitimate, in this view, for law-abiding citizens to want government to divert some resources from law enforcement to the other needs, but their views shouldn't count extra in virtue of the support from the ex-felons like Snake, who are not really weighing public costs and benefits but are simply voting their illegitimate interests.

This, I think, gets at the real objection: Some notion that ex-felons will simply vote for their anti-social interests rather than voting for the public good, as they conceive it.

But if that's the problem with felons voting, then the whole of American democracy is suspect.  We do not generally require that people vote for the public good.  Quite the contrary, candidates appeal to the electorate by arguing that they, rather than their opponents, will deliver the goods that individual citizens want for themselves: lower taxes, more services, etc.  Slogans like Ronald Reagan's 1980 "are you better off than you were four years ago?" reflect this very conventional wisdom.

Perhaps a confusion with jury duty may explain the antipathy to felons voting because historically, the right to vote tended to go hand in hand with the right to serve on a jury.  Because of the requirement of unanimity in criminal cases, a single felon holdout who votes against conviction because he despises the criminal law really could sink the criminal justice system.  But the numerical dynamics are so different between voting on a jury and in an election that even if one thinks the case against former felons serving on juries is compelling, it doesn't carry over to voting.

So what, at bottom, grounds the case against felons voting?  I believe it's some notion that voting is a "privilege" that felons, through their anti-social conduct, have sacrificed.  If so, that would readily explain Santorum's (reasonable) position: A former felon who has served his full sentence has, in the cliche, "paid his debt to society," and thus can be given back the privilege.  Romney's position, presumably, is that someone who has once committed a felony is so irredeemably bad that he can never be trusted again.  But then, one wants to know, why doesn't Romney want all felons kept in prison for life?  After all, the harm that a single felon can do through direct violence is much greater than he can do through voting.

I just said, parenthetically, that Santorum's position--ex-felons should be able to vote after they've served their time but not while in prison or on parole or probation--is reasonable.  I believe that a good case could even be made for permitting people currently in prison to vote (so long as their votes would count in the communities from which they were removed, rather than potentially dominating the distant small towns in which prisons are often located). Prisoners have interests and, moreover, much evidence shows that permitting people some voice in their own lives is more likely to bring them to act pro-socially than treating them as monsters will.  Plus, eliminating felon disenfranchisement would eliminate the gross racial disparate impact that goes with it.

For now, though, I don't stake anything on the position that current prisoners should be permitted to vote.  I note only that the use of Santorum's position against him in the South Carolina campaign is indeed a sign that it was one of the most laudable aspects of Santorum's Senate career.


GED said...

Good post, but you might have alluded more to the legal basis for such laws against felons not voting, and how they are constitutional/unconstitutional, like Richardson v. Ramirez or Hunter v. Underwood

Bob Hockett said...

Hear hear on the opening adage. My own working hypothesis is akin, even if not quite identical: For any complaint leveled by a self-proclaimed 'Republican' against some position taken either by a Democrat or by a second Republican whom the first Republican wishes to tar as an inauthentic Republican, there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of the proposition that this same complaint, were it issued by a sane human being, would constitute a compliment.

Joe said...

I appreciate this apparent consistent expression of Santorum's morality -- redemption. The felon is not a reprobate for all time.

I also agree with the two states (I believe) who allow people in prison to vote. The discussion on the point here is agreeable. There can be examples where religious exercise or even free speech might raise penal concerns, but voting, not so much.

And, each will have a photo id.

Unknown said...

It would be interesting to see statistics on how ex-felons vote, especially where a candidate espouses law-and-order positions. An ex-felon might rationally be more afraid of violent criminals than the average citizen, or he might be more aware of the potential for abuse in three-strikes laws, judges who consistently limit the Fourth Amendment, legislators beholden to prison industry PACs, etc.

Either way, they should get to make that position part of the sovereign will. We are, I hear, well past the point where more than 1% of the population has done prison time. That's a substantial voting bloc with a valuable perspective on significant public policy matters. How can we reasonably make decisions on, say, prison budget cuts, while excluding the one group with first-hand knowledge of the subject?

Anonymous said...

Either way, they should need to generate that placement part while using sovereign will.Buy RS GoldWe are, I hear, effectively previous the point where additional than 1% while using populace has achieved prisoner of war camp time. understanding that is a considerable voting bloc acquiring a important viewpoint on main community plan matters. How can weBuy Gold WOW reasonably make choices on, say, prisoner of war camp spending budget cuts, while excluding the only one founded with first-hand intelligence while using subject?

toryburchshoesgoods said...

I also agree with the two states (I believe) who allow people in prison to vote. The discussion on the point here is agreeable. There can be examples where religious exercise or even free speech might raise penal concerns, but voting, not so much.Windows 7 Key
Buy Windows 7 Key
Cheap Windows 7 Key

wow items said...

It is critical to established ambitions, the two long lasting along with short-term. Will not proceed crazy, collection realistic objectives. Once you accomplish one, combination rid of it the list and make up a brand new one. Taking this particular, 'little ways to be able to good results,' strategy, provide you with feeling of outcome and take great pride 7 ultimate 64 bit buy office 2010 product key windows xp home key

copdresses said...

Good post Launch x431,launch x431 scanner,launch x431 gds

Unknown said...

(consistent with some of his statements on this issue), that he means violent felony, rather than some relatively minor offense that happens to be classified as a felony. Suppose Snake was convicted of burglary, fifa coins | fut coins | ESO GOLD | cheap fifa 14 coins

Unknown said...

This post is just fantastic, you have great blogging skills
Bane Vest

panca-samudera said...

The article posted was very informative and useful
thanks for sharing..
jaring futsal || jaring golf || tali tambang || jaring proyek || jaring bangunan || jaring gedung

Anonymous said...

I am very happy to discover your post as it will become on top in my collection of favorite blogs to visit.
betterathomedc |

Anonymous said...

Greetings interesting and join here masturbasi bersama dengan onani di bantu dengan alat sex.

Unknown said...

i love the jogos de vestir as they are very girly to play also
slovakcatercume |

Unknown said...

I really loved reading your blog. It was very well authored and easy to understand.
wizzjobs |

Unknown said...

An interesting discussion is unquestionably worth comment. I Krim Pemutih Pemutih Kulit Krim Pemutih Muka baju gamis pusat grosir baju Rumah Dijual Bintaro Rumah BSD Rumah Dijual BSD Rumah Gading Serpong Rumah Dijual Gading Serpong

Unknown said...

refore the graphs must not be chosen to Tas Grosir Batam Model Baju Wanita Jual Rumah Anggrek Grosir Tas Murah Branded Harga Tas Supplier Baju Rumah Dijual Tas Branded Terbaru Tas Batam Murah Jual Rumah Di Bsd K Jual Rumah Bsd The Fashion Korea Tas Branded Kw 1 Dijual Rumah Di Bsd Jual Baju Korea Murah Rumah Dijual Alam S Rumah Dikontrakkan Jual Rumah Di Alam Jual Rumah Di Alam Grosirtas

Unknown said...

. I'm very glad to see such excellent i Jasa Rumah Bangunan Jasa Desain Rumah Jasa Desain Interior Jual Paving Jual Pasir Jual Bata Jual Hebel Jual Baja Ringan Jual Genteng Jual Besi Jasa Pasang Contblock Jasa Cor Hotmix

Unknown said...

nanah keluar dari penis penyakit penis keluar nanah obat penis keluar nanah cara menngobati kencing nanah pada pria herbal gonore cara mengobati kelamin keluar nanah kencing perih dan keluar nanah

Unknown said...

obat kanker payudara stadium 3 kanker serviks obat kanker serviks obat herbal kanker

Unknown said...

cara mengatasi penyakit secara alami
Obat Herbal Insomnia Akut Obat Herbal Radang Tenggorokan Paling Ampuh Obat Herbal Hernia Tanpa Operasi Obat Herbal Vitiligo Ampuh Obat Herbal Gagal Ginjal Tanpa Cuci Darah Obat Herbal Gendang Telinga Pecah Obat Herbal Leukemia Akut Obat Herbal Kanker Otak Stadium 3 Obat Herbal Amandel Tanpa Operasi Obat Herbal Hepatitis B Paling Ampuh Obat Herbal Kelenjar Tiroid Paling Ampuh Obat Herbal Kista Mujarab Obat Herbal Jantung Koroner Paling Ampuh Obat Herbal Penyakit Chikungunya Obat Herbal Kanker Prostat Tanpa Operasi Khasiat Ace Maxs

Unknown said...

cara mengobati penyakit wasir obat wasir herbal denature obat wasir ambeien herpes kelamin denature

Unknown said...

obat wasir obat sipilis raja singa obat kencing nanah atau gonore penyebab penis keluar cairan nanah penyebab penis keluar cairan nanah obat penis keluar cairan nanah mengapa kencing perih dan keluar cairan nanah mengapa kencing perih dan keluar cairan nanah cara mengobati penis keluar cairan nanah cara mengobati penis keluar cairan nanah

Unknown said...

Kami menjual aneka produk kesehatan termurah dan terlengkap.

Obat Pembesar Penis
Jual Obat Pembesar Penis
Vimax Canada
Vimax Herbal
Cara Membesarkan Penis
Jual Vimax Asli
Vimax Indonesia
Vimax Original
Harga Vimax
Jual Vimax
Obat Vimax
Vimax Asli
Harga Vimax Asli
Alat Pembesar Penis
Vimax Extender
Vakum Pembesar Penis
Vacum Pembesar Penis
Vigrx Plus
Sex Toys
Seks Toys
Jual Sex Toys
Alat Bantu Sex Wanita
Alat Bantu Wanita
Jual Alat Bantu Wanita
seksualitas wanita

Unknown said...

Obat kencing Nanah De Nature Obat Herbal obat Kutil Kelamincara menyembuhkan wasir alami penyebab wasir atau ambeien dan obat wasir atau ambeien obat wasir ramuan tradisional