Tuesday, December 29, 2015

It's Serious, Important, and Interesting, But It's Still Funny

by Neil H. Buchanan

The big political story of 2015 was the unexpected emergence -- and even more unexpected staying power -- of Donald Trump as a presidential candidate.  For most of the summer and early autumn, I chose to write nothing about his candidacy, in part because the absurdity of it all made serious commentary seem pointless, while sarcastic commentary would have been redundant.  As the story grew, however, it became all but impossible not to say something about the emptiness of Trump's assertions, the lack of any details in the few policy positions that he announced, the ugliness of his rhetoric, and so on.

As the year ended, I used three Dorf on Law posts (here, here, and here), as well as my most recent Verdict column, to assess an emerging discussion among politicians and pundits about whether Trump could destroy the Republican party in 2016 (and perhaps permanently).  In those pieces, I did not actually discuss Trump's assertions in any detail, but I certainly made clear my negative views about his candidacy.  In response to the second of those Dorf on Law posts, Professor Dorf received a misdirected piece of angry email that was intended for me, titled "MY ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT."  (Yes, of course it was in all caps.)  Here is the email in its unedited entirety:
As a Lawyer you should know nothing pleases the Law more then brevity. You prolixity is your quicksand. A bore is a person who will not come to the point. A greater bore is a person who continues to talk after he has made his point.

Counselor! Stop! I got the point! I do not mean to be unkind but I have read enough of your contributions to know somewhere half-way though reading you become a great bore. I'd hate to have to read your briefs.

I take it you're a nice intelligent guy. I am sad to read of the misery you feel will befall you if Trump is elected, as he will, and for good reason. The reason is voters are not excited about Trump as Trump but they feel in their gut they cannot endure another 4 years of anything like Obama's " God Damm America" race-obsessed presidency and Trump , and only Trump, is the guy to "Make America Great" again.

I'm not as smart as all you Democrat-Socialist minded guys trying to sabotage or bad mouth Trump hoping the voters will imitate the words you talk about because you're so smart they too will sound smart. You guys are just too smart for your own good.

I will vote to hire Trump. I know in my gut I'm right. I can tell you why in thousands words but let me say here very simply: I want him to be another Chainsaw Al Dunlap in arresting the growth of the Federal Government. Period! I know we have a million problems, I can talk for an hour without interruption on all of them without becoming a bore but the first problem we need to take care of for the economic health and welfare of this country -- and yours --is the national debt. You're an idiot--just because you cannot and the government can print money to avoid bankruptcy you think you can continue to spend over cost -- don't bet your life on it. It will take a chainsaw guy to cut down spending by increasing taxes on the wealthy and reduce spending on the poor --sorry about that --and we must or we're another Greece.

Citizen Dorf, you have a choice. The President and Congress will be just about the same as we have had it for the past 8 years of gross stupidity if anyone else is elected. It's no longer a question of Party which you have explained is as easily changed as the next Supreme Court opinion on Race. The only way to change things is to hire Trump--with all his faults - you get the bitter with the sweet - but he's your man to do the job. You wait for the "perfect" politician to come along and you will lose out. Take him up on the deal he's making you. Give him the chainsaw and tell him to go to work! It will take all of 4 years. Then you can hire a man of your dreams.
Even though I obviously disagree with nearly everything in that email, I am not reproducing it here to mock it.  Instead, I find it fascinating, and I think that the writer of that email would be pleased to know that my bottom line is this: I could easily believe that the email was written by Trump himself, rather than by one of his acolytes.

Think about the cornucopia of everything that is Trump on display in that email.  The insults.  (I am described as "a great bore" and "an idiot."  The writer might as well have called me "low energy.")  The baseless bravado.  ("I am sad to read of the misery you feel will befall you if Trump is elected, as he will, and for good reason.") The stilted prose. ("You [sic] prolixity is your quicksand.")  The puffed up patriotism.  ("Citizen Dorf, you have a choice.")  The complete falsehoods masquerading as unassailable facts.  ("... just because you cannot and the government can print money to avoid bankruptcy you think you can continue to spend over cost -- don't bet your life on it. ... or we're another Greece.")  The weak attempts at charming anti-intellectualism. ("I'm not as smart as all you Democrat-Socialist minded guys.")  The tic-like references to the Trump-as-businessman pose.  ("I will vote to hire Trump."  "Take him up on the deal he's making you.")  The odd and defensive comments about race. (Note especially the description of "Obama's 'God Damm America' race-obsessed presidency." Also: "It's no longer a question of Party which you have explained is as easily changed as the next Supreme Court opinion on Race.")  Note also how the writer personalizes criticisms of Trump, responding to my statements that Trump is dangerous by referring to "the misery you feel will befall you if Trump is elected."  Befall me?

In any event, this is not standard-issue Republicanism, even of the more recent extreme variety.   For example, the writer wants to "increase taxes on the wealthy" (although he is "sorry" that spending on the poor will be cut, too).  Beyond such passing remarks about policy choices, however, the exercise is mostly about empty rhetoric and rote repetition of slogans.  ("Trump , and only Trump, is the guy to 'Make America Great' again.")

As an aside for those readers too young to understand the reference, I should note that Al Dunlap was a takeover specialist in the 1970's, 80's, and 90's, who engineered massive accounting frauds.  (When he was finally brought down, of course, he walked away with a $100 million golden parachute.)  He was popular in some quarters for massive layoffs of employees at companies that he owned.  Time magazine in 2010 listed Dunlap among the nation's ten "most egregiously bad chief execs."  This dated reference by the email writer is also consistent with what we know of the demographics of Trump's supporters.
In short, for those of us who have been wondering why some people support Trump, there it is, in all of its illogical glory.  This is still utterly puzzling, but (apparently unlike me) it is definitely not boring.


David Ricardo said...

Thanks for posting the email in its entirety. It certainly produced a lot of chuckles, not the least of which was the reference to Al Dunlop. The total irrationality of the letter is amazing, particularly with respect to the deficit and the hatred of Mr. Obama. It’s as though the author was totally ignorant of the facts, like that under President Obama the deficit has been reduce from over one trillion to a couple of hundred billion, and as a huge reduction as a percent of GDP. Among other things the author apparently does not know is that in order to reduce the national debt the government must run a surplus and that the Trump tax policy is to increase the national debt by billions.

But on a serious note the post illustrates that it will be impossible to have an objective conversation with people like these because they live in a fantasy world unencumbered by facts and analysis. That is very, very scary.

Wendy Owen said...

Marriage restoration..
I lost my husband to another woman 2 weeks ago after 27 years of marriage . We had a lovely marriage but he started a relationship with a co worker who chased after him . He is living away near his work and her and refuses to talk to me or to come home . I am devastated and am finding it hard to cope . I wish I did not love him and that I could move on but I can't . I don't know how to stop feeling like this I wish I didn't as its eating me away and I m starting to feel ill. I have degraded myself begging him to come home all to no avail. I became very worried and needed help. As I was browsing through the internet one day, I came across a website that suggested that Dr Frank Ojo can help solve marital problems, restore broken relationships and so on. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he did a spell for me. tow days later, my husband came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. I and my family are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Frank Ojo . If you need a spell caster that can cast a spell that truly works, I suggest you contact him. He will not disappoint you. if you have any problem contact him, I give you 100% guarantee that he will help you, This is his details, E-mail: Templeofloveandprosperity@gmail.com , Web site: http://lovespell2.yolasite.com . Mobile number +2348072370762. Thank you all for reading.

David Ricardo said...

Upon further reflection I wonder if the e-mail isn't someone having a little fun at our expense, perhaps a regular DonL responder like the gentleman from Brookline, or a former/current colleague of Mr. Buchanan's or even someone, male or female, from the Dorf household.

If so, the fact that there are those of us who take this farcical submission as genuine correspondence reflects on just how outrageous Mr. Trump and his supporters have become.

Shag from Brookline said...

David, no, twas not I, although I do have in the back of my mind the fact that Mike got me good with his April Fools post on Dersh. Perhaps it was Mike himself getting practice for next April. But I do appreciate the "gentleman" reference.